Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill literature-review-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/literature-review-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/literature-review-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/literature-review-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/literature-review-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/literature-review-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.03566 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01426 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00713 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00357 |
Grade A, and why
literature-review-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 466 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Literature Review Planner
Comprehensive frameworks for planning, conducting, and synthesizing literature reviews across academic and professional research contexts.
Review Types
| Type | Purpose | Scope | Methodology Rigor | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Narrative | Broad overview of a topic | Wide, flexible | Low-Medium | Background sections, introductions |
| Systematic | Answer a specific research question | Narrow, predefined | High | Evidence-based decisions, clinical practice |
| Scoping | Map available evidence on a topic | Wide, structured | Medium | Emerging fields, identifying gaps |
| Meta-Analysis | Quantitative synthesis of findings | Narrow, statistical | Highest | Combining effect sizes, treatment efficacy |
| Rapid | Timely evidence synthesis | Focused, abbreviated | Medium | Policy decisions, time-constrained contexts |
| Umbrella | Review of existing reviews | Reviews only | High | Overarching evidence synthesis |
| Integrative | Synthesize diverse methodologies | Wide, mixed methods | Medium | Combining qualitative and quantitative |
Choosing the Right Review Type
Do you need to answer a specific, focused question?
YES --> Is quantitative synthesis of effect sizes needed?
YES --> Meta-Analysis
NO --> Systematic Review
NO --> Do you need to map the breadth of evidence?
YES --> Is the field well-established?
YES --> Umbrella Review (review of reviews)
NO --> Scoping Review
NO --> Do you need to combine qualitative and quantitative?
YES --> Integrative Review
NO --> Is time constrained (< 3 months)?
YES --> Rapid Review
NO --> Narrative Review
Search Strategy Development
PICO/PEO Framework
Use structured frameworks to define your research question:
| Framework | Element | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| PICO | Population | Who is being studied | Adults with Type 2 diabetes |
| Intervention | What treatment/exposure | Telemedicine consultations | |
| Comparison | Alternative to intervention | In-person consultations | |
| Outcome | What is measured | HbA1c levels, patient satisfaction | |
| PEO | Population | Who is being studied | Software engineering teams |
| Exposure | Phenomenon of interest | Agile methodology adoption | |
| Outcome | What is measured | Productivity, code quality |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago First seen · 466 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 56f7227c54f7
literature-review-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository travisjneuman/.claude (101 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 3,566 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
few-shot-prompt-example-formatting
Guidelines and instructions for Few-shot prompt example formatting.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…