Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Travisun/Opptrix --skill alligator-index-timinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Travisun/OpptrixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisun/opptrix/alligator-index-timing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisun/opptrix/alligator-index-timing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisun/opptrix/alligator-index-timing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisun/opptrix/alligator-index-timing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisun/opptrix/alligator-index-timing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.01015 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00508 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00203 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
alligator-index-timing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
鳄鱼线指数择时
方法溯源 QuantsPlaybook 鳄鱼线指数择时及轮动（SignalMaker alligator_indicator_timing）；本技能用平台日 K 做规则状态解读，不联网取数。
何时使用
用户要对 A股指数/场内 ETF 做鳄鱼线（下颚/牙齿/上唇）与 AO 动量震荡的择时状态诊断。
边界：纯指标手册用 @skill:lean-indicator-playbook；ETF 轮动组合勿与 @skill:lean-etf-global-rotation 合并。默认网页交付。
分析架构（投研方法）
- 问题/假设：鳄鱼线是否多/空排列触发？AO 是否连续上行/下行？二者是否共振？
- 证据清单：日 K OHLCV（事实）、参数窗口（假设）、共振持仓状态（推断）
- 多维交叉验证：鳄鱼线排列 vs AO 连续方向；冲突时记平坦
- 结论与不确定：滞后排列、震荡市假信号
- 事实 | 假设 | 推断 分栏强制
数据维度
| 维度 | 取数方向 | 缺失时 |
|---|---|---|
| 标的 | search_instruments / ask_user |
先确认 |
| 日 K | get_instrument_chart → workspace_write |
不编造 |
| 计算 | opptrix_run 本技能脚本 |
失败则说明 |
| 交付 | list_web_vendor → create_web |
可跳过口头要点 |
步骤
- 确认默认 CN 指数/ETF 与参数（periods/lag/ao_window，有默认值）。
- 拉取日 K，写入 workspace JSON（
bars含 OHLCV）。 - 运行：
python scripts/alligator_index_timing.py --input data.json --output result.json - 解读
signal（1/-1/0）与series（jaw/teeth/lips/ao）。 - 分栏结论后默认
create_web。
输入 / 输出
- 输入：契约见仓库
docs/quants-skill-script-contract.md；params.periods默认(13,8,5)，lag默认(8,5,3)。 - 输出：
ok/signal/series/metrics/assumptions；AO 为研报口径（非 TradingView median price）。
依赖与降级
- 仅 Python 标准库；无 numpy/pandas/talib。
- 样本过短则
ok=false并写errors。
网页报告建议目录
- 范围与参数
- 鳄鱼线/AO 当前状态
- 共振信号时间线
- 事实 / 假设 / 推断
- 局限与观察清单
- 免责声明
禁止
- 荐股；把信号写成买卖指令
- 脚本内联网取数（jqdata / tushare / qlib / HTTP 行情）
- 假装完整回测引擎或伪造胜率
- 无交付就结束（默认 web）
- 与
lean-*技能合并或冒充
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 79 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A 0f0e509c8276
alligator-index-timing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Travisun/Opptrix (231 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 1,015 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
national-team-position
A Chinese-language analysis tool that estimates changes in China’s government-backed ETF holdings by tracking ETF share counts and related index prices. ETFs are funds traded on stock exchanges, and the “national team” refers here to Central Huijin, a state investment company.
caijing-ipo-hk
A Chinese-language adviser for Hong Kong stock initial public offerings, or IPOs—the first sale of a company's shares to the public. It covers how to apply, how much to apply for, and risks such as the share price falling below the offering price.
caijing-fundamental
A finance research skill for writing a detailed, forward-looking analysis of a listed company’s business, financials, valuation, risks, and investment arguments. It covers companies listed in mainland China and Hong Kong.
rodya-caijing-studio
A toolkit for researching Chinese A-share and Hong Kong-listed companies and producing financial content. It includes separate workflows for company fundamentals, earnings, valuation, risks, industries, and IPO checks.
caijing-earnings
A finance research skill for reviewing listed companies’ earnings reports, or preparing for an upcoming report. It focuses on Chinese A- and Hong Kong-listed companies.
caijing-industry
A finance research skill for mapping an industry or investment theme from its drivers through its suppliers, customers, and representative companies. It is about the wider sector, not ranking individual stocks.