Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Travisun/Opptrix --skill earnings-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Travisun/OpptrixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisun/opptrix/earnings-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisun/opptrix/earnings-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisun/opptrix/earnings-quality.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.00976 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00488 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
earnings-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
盈利质量
何时使用
用户要评估 会计利润的质量与可持续性（现金流匹配、应计、费用资本化线索、一次性项目等），而非只要报告期速读亮点。边界：vs @skill:earnings-quick-read——速读给关键数字变化；本技能给 质量框架与红旗清单。三表完整预测模型用 @skill:financial-model。
分析架构（投研方法）
- 问题/假设：利润增长是否由经营现金支撑？是否存在质量红旗需跟踪？
- 证据清单：三表、财务指标、概况中的业务描述
- 多维交叉验证：净利润 vs 经营现金流；应收/存货 vs 收入；非经常性 vs 扣非（若可得）
- 结论与不确定：比率与科目为事实；「操纵嫌疑」仅为待查推断，不做造假实锤
- 风险与缺口：缺指标、跨市场科目名差异
- 事实 | 假设 | 推断 分栏强制
数据维度
| 维度 | 取数方向 | 缺失时 |
|---|---|---|
| 标的与报告期 | ask_user / 用户指定 |
先确认 |
| 财务摘要 | get_instrument_financials |
质量结论降级 |
| 三表 | income / balance / cash_flow 工具 | 缺表现省略对应检验 |
| 指标 | get_instrument_financial_indicators |
用原始科目手算并说明 |
| 概况 | get_instrument_profile |
不做强行行业对比 |
| 交付 | list_web_vendor → create_web |
用户只要口头要点时可跳过 |
步骤
- 确认标的与报告期。
- 取数：财务摘要、三表、
get_instrument_financial_indicators。 - 质量体检：现金转化、应计粗估、营运资本压力、一次性项目（若可识别）。
- 红旗清单：仅列「待核实」项，禁止实锤造假。
- 交付网页（默认）：
list_web_vendor→create_web；已有则read_web/update_web。
网页报告建议目录
- 标的、报告期与时效
- 利润与经营现金流对照
- 关键质量指标表
- 营运资本与应计线索
- 红旗 / 待核实清单（推断）
- 事实 | 假设 | 推断分栏
- 风险与数据缺口
- 免责声明（无买卖建议；非审计结论；不做造假实锤）
禁止
- 荐股；指控财务造假并写成既定事实
- 编造指标
- 禁止无交付就结束（默认须有 web 产物，除非用户明确只要口头要点）
- 与速读技能混淆：只列同比不做质量框架
- assumption / not-feasible 须诚实降级
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 69 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 626cf2637f4f
earnings-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository Travisun/Opptrix (230 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 976 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
national-team-position
A Chinese-language analysis tool that estimates changes in China’s government-backed ETF holdings by tracking ETF share counts and related index prices. ETFs are funds traded on stock exchanges, and the “national team” refers here to Central Huijin, a state investment company.
caijing-ipo-hk
A Chinese-language adviser for Hong Kong stock initial public offerings, or IPOs—the first sale of a company's shares to the public. It covers how to apply, how much to apply for, and risks such as the share price falling below the offering price.
caijing-fundamental
A finance research skill for writing a detailed, forward-looking analysis of a listed company’s business, financials, valuation, risks, and investment arguments. It covers companies listed in mainland China and Hong Kong.
rodya-caijing-studio
A toolkit for researching Chinese A-share and Hong Kong-listed companies and producing financial content. It includes separate workflows for company fundamentals, earnings, valuation, risks, industries, and IPO checks.
caijing-earnings
A finance research skill for reviewing listed companies’ earnings reports, or preparing for an upcoming report. It focuses on Chinese A- and Hong Kong-listed companies.
caijing-valuation
A Chinese-language adviser that assesses whether a stock's current valuation looks high or low. It adapts the comparison to the industry and examines historical and peer-company valuation ranges.