Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Travisun/Opptrix --skill lean-risk-paritygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Travisun/OpptrixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisun/opptrix/lean-risk-parity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisun/opptrix/lean-risk-parity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisun/opptrix/lean-risk-parity/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisun/opptrix/lean-risk-parity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisun/opptrix/lean-risk-parity.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.01317 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00659 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
lean-risk-parity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
LEAN 风险平价
方法溯源 QuantConnect LEAN 与经典风险平价 / 风险预算组合思路；本技能做风险贡献目标权重框架，禁止假装跑完整 LEAN 引擎。
何时使用
用户要在 A股/场内 ETF 篮子上按波动或风险贡献分配权重（LEAN 方法溯源，非美股原版照搬）。
边界：等权用 @skill:lean-equal-weight-pcm；均值方差用 @skill:lean-mean-variance；已有目标只算差额用 @skill:rebalance。默认交付网页。
A股适配（默认）
- 默认市场 CN（A股 / 场内 ETF）。用户点名美股/港股再切换，并声明数据口径与微观结构差异。
- 默认 CN 资产（股/债/货币 ETF 等）风险平价；杠杆/做空受限时改为「波动倒数加权多头」并声明非经典杠杆 RP。
- 不可硬适配或数据缺口时：首页横幅写清完整度（partial 或更严）+ 必要时
ask_user。
分析架构（投研方法）
- 问题/假设：在约定波动/协方差估计下，各资产风险贡献是否接近目标预算？
- 证据清单：收益波动估计（事实/样本）、风险预算（假设）、配置含义（推断）
- 多维交叉验证：权重和；边际风险贡献加总是否合理；简化对角协方差须披露
- 结论与不确定：相关突变时失效；杠杆未建模须说明
- 风险与缺口：样本短、资产过少/过多、无法估波动
- 微观/制度风险：涨跌停钝化、T+1、ST/停牌、融券受限（及相关会计口径差异）；不得按美股连续可成交或自由做空假设叙事
- 事实 | 假设 | 推断 分栏强制
数据维度
| 维度 | 取数方向 | 缺失时 |
|---|---|---|
| 成分 | ask_user / search_instruments |
先确认 |
| 价格序列 | get_instrument_chart |
not-feasible |
| 风险预算 | ask_user |
默认等风险贡献并标假设 |
| 现持仓 | get_portfolio_holdings |
可选对照 |
| 计算 | opptrix_run / workspace_write |
对角简化并披露 |
| 交付 | list_web_vendor → create_web |
可跳过口头要点 |
| A股资产代理 | CN 股债货 ETF 波动 | 缺资产类 → ask_user；禁止装美股期货 RP |
步骤
- 确认默认 CN：标的/宇宙为 A股或场内 ETF（用户点名其他市场再切换并声明差异）。应用涨跌停/T+1/融券受限等微观约束（见 A股适配）。
- 确认成分与风险预算（等贡献 vs 自定义）。
- 声明非 LEAN Runtime。
- 估计波动/协方差；写明窗口与简化。
- 求解风险平价权重并校验贡献。
- 分栏结论 → 默认
create_web。
网页报告建议目录
- 范围：默认 A股/场内 ETF + LEAN 溯源
- 波动与协方差假设表
- 目标权重与风险贡献
- 与等权对照（可选）
- 事实 / 假设 / 推断
- 相关突变与杠杆局限
- A股适配与限制（默认 CN；微观结构/代理/完整度）
- 免责声明（方案≠下单；无荐股）
禁止
- 荐股；把风险平价权重写成买卖指令
- 禁止假装跑完整 LEAN 引擎
- 隐瞒对角/简化协方差假设
- 禁止无交付就结束（默认 web）
- 与
@skill:rebalance混淆：本技能生成风险平价目标；rebalance 执行用户目标差额 - 禁止把美股成分/ETF 清单不经映射直接当 A股结果
- 禁止假设可自由融券做空
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 85 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A f03be153215b
lean-risk-parity is a skill published in the GitHub repository Travisun/Opptrix (231 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 1,317 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
national-team-position
A Chinese-language analysis tool that estimates changes in China’s government-backed ETF holdings by tracking ETF share counts and related index prices. ETFs are funds traded on stock exchanges, and the “national team” refers here to Central Huijin, a state investment company.
caijing-ipo-hk
A Chinese-language adviser for Hong Kong stock initial public offerings, or IPOs—the first sale of a company's shares to the public. It covers how to apply, how much to apply for, and risks such as the share price falling below the offering price.
caijing-fundamental
A finance research skill for writing a detailed, forward-looking analysis of a listed company’s business, financials, valuation, risks, and investment arguments. It covers companies listed in mainland China and Hong Kong.
rodya-caijing-studio
A toolkit for researching Chinese A-share and Hong Kong-listed companies and producing financial content. It includes separate workflows for company fundamentals, earnings, valuation, risks, industries, and IPO checks.
caijing-earnings
A finance research skill for reviewing listed companies’ earnings reports, or preparing for an upcoming report. It focuses on Chinese A- and Hong Kong-listed companies.
caijing-valuation
A Chinese-language adviser that assesses whether a stock's current valuation looks high or low. It adapts the comparison to the industry and examines historical and peer-company valuation ranges.