Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TreatTrick/skill-sync --skill openspec-exploregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TreatTrick/skill-syncWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/treattrick/skill-sync/openspec-explore)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/treattrick/skill-sync/openspec-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/treattrick/skill-sync/openspec-explore/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/treattrick/skill-sync/openspec-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/treattrick/skill-sync/openspec-explore.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.02269 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00908 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00454 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00227 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-explore scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to openspec-explore — 34 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 302 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Enter explore mode. Think deeply. Visualize freely. Follow the conversation wherever it goes.
IMPORTANT: Explore mode is for thinking, not implementing. You may read files, search code, and investigate the codebase, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, remind them to exit explore mode first and create a change proposal. You MAY create OpenSpec artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) if the user asks—that's capturing thinking, not implementing.
This is a stance, not a workflow. There are no fixed steps, no required sequence, no mandatory outputs. You're a thinking partner helping the user explore.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
The Stance
- Curious, not prescriptive - Ask questions that emerge naturally, don't follow a script
- Open threads, not interrogations - Surface multiple interesting directions and let the user follow what resonates. Don't funnel them through a single path of questions.
- Visual - Use ASCII diagrams liberally when they'd help clarify thinking
- Adaptive - Follow interesting threads, pivot when new information emerges
- Patient - Don't rush to conclusions, let the shape of the problem emerge
- Grounded - Explore the actual codebase when relevant, don't just theorize
What You Might Do
Depending on what the user brings, you might:
Explore the problem space
- Ask clarifying questions that emerge from what they said
- Challenge assumptions
- Reframe the problem
- Find analogies
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 302 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A ebf98ad01d0e
openspec-explore is a skill published in the GitHub repository TreatTrick/skill-sync (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 2,269 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to openspec-explore, differing in 34 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
package-author
A packaging guide for turning scripts, skills, or an MCP service into a standard plugin package. MCP is a way for an AI assistant to connect to external tools.
writing-livekit-scenarios
Creates and maintains the scenarios a LiveKit agent simulation runs, and wires the agent to consume them. Use when the user asks "what should I test", "generate simulation scenarios", "write scenarios for my agent", "add a scenario for X", "organize my scenario files", "my simulations are flaky", "the scenario hits my…
ultralytics-platform
This skill should be used when user asks to "upload my model to Ultralytics Platform", "push this run to the platform", "upload a dataset to platform", "download a dataset from platform", "search platform datasets", "start cloud training", "train on platform GPUs", "export a model on platform", "deploy a model…
children-warm-orange
A warm, playful children’s-book visual style led by orange, with bright green, pink, blue, and yellow accents. It uses rounded cartoon illustrations, handwritten-looking headings, and childlike objects such as balloons and paper planes.
healing-color-card
A soft visual style inspired by emotional wellness cards, combining lavender, warm peach, mint green, rounded shapes, gentle gradients, and lots of space.
minimal-white
A visual design guide for very clean interfaces with white or pale-gray backgrounds, dark text and small amounts of blue. It emphasizes generous empty space, simple alignment and restrained decoration.