Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TrevorEdris/fellowship-of-the-workflows --skill chaos-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TrevorEdris/fellowship-of-the-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/chaos-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/chaos-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/chaos-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/chaos-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/chaos-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00334 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
chaos-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 453a1a7d62d7
chaos-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository TrevorEdris/fellowship-of-the-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 334 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
apex-review
Cross-cutting review of recent work — catches gaps between specialists. Use when asked to "review what we built", "check the work", "pre-launch review", or after completing a significant chunk of work.
prism
Prism's local index of this repository. Use before editing, renaming or deleting unfamiliar code, to orient in a new repo, to review a PR or diff, to pick a lens, or to run a saved habit.
bugfix-review
Diagnose a reported defect, verify its cause, and review the proposed fix.
sync-bridge
Reviews and guides Chromium Sync Model API (DataTypeSyncBridge) implementations, including DataTypeStore persistence and forwards/backwards compatibility for sync specifics. Use when implementing or reviewing a DataTypeSyncBridge subclass, DataTypeStore usage, sync metadata persistence, conflict resolution, or…
sync-model-processor
Reviews changes to Chromium Sync model internals in components/sync/model/, including ClientTagBasedDataTypeProcessor, ClientTagBasedRemoteUpdateHandler, ProcessorEntity, ProcessorEntityMetadata, and ProcessorEntityTracker. Use when modifying or reviewing processor state transitions, entity metadata tracking, conflict…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…