Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TsukumoHQ/trovex. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TsukumoHQ/trovex/main/.claude/skills/review-backend/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TsukumoHQ/trovexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tsukumohq/trovex/review-backend)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tsukumohq/trovex/review-backend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tsukumohq/trovex/review-backend/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tsukumohq/trovex/review-backend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tsukumohq/trovex/review-backend.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03377 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01688 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00675 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00338 |
Grade A, and why
review-backend scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
**Already covered by tooling — do NOT re-flag here** (they fail CI mechanically): ruff lint (E/F/I/N/UP/B/SIM/RUF), the pytest suite incl. `tests/test_security.py`, `scripts/security_guard.py` (eval/exec/os.system/shell= The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 76 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d24bcb585621
review-backend is a skill published in the GitHub repository TsukumoHQ/trovex (7 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,377 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
opensrc
Fetch dependency source code to give AI agents deeper implementation context. Use when the agent needs to understand how a library works internally, read source code for a package, fetch implementation details for a dependency, or explore how an npm/PyPI/crates.io package is built. Triggers include "fetch source for"…
code-review-api
Use when reviewing REST or HTTP API endpoints, controllers, or route handlers. Covers HTTP status codes, idempotency, versioning, auth, pagination, error shapes, and rate limiting. Load instead of the general code-review skill for API-focused reviews.
codebase-design
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
pr-reviewer
Reviews a diff or security scope read-only using evidence-tiered findings, structural and context-error rubrics, and repository review policy. Use when asked to "review my changes", "structural review", "review for AI patterns", or "security audit". For applying fixes use tidy; for UI defects use ui-design.
spawn-reviewers
Spawn and collect the reviewer fleet at stage20spawnreviewers. Consumes spawn.json.spec (the authoritative spawn spec from derive-spawn-spec / derive-static-spec), resolves GRAPHPROJECT, builds per-agent prompts from the per-agent template + role suffixes (Bug Hunter A/B, Unified Auditor, Domain Critics, Impact…
openclaw-github-dedupe
Investigate a cluster of GitHub issues and PRs, determine canonical candidates, post duplicate/related status, preserve contributor credit, and execute cleanup actions. Supports autonomous mode for provided-link-only closeout, merge/fix follow-through, changelog, and post-merge issue/PR cleanup.