Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tta-lab/ttal-cli/sp-verifynpx skills add tta-lab/ttal-cli --skill sp-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tta-lab/ttal-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tta-lab/ttal-cli/sp-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tta-lab/ttal-cli/sp-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tta-lab/ttal-cli/sp-verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00949 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00475 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
sp-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to verification-before-completion — 36 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verification Before Completion
Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
The Iron Law
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
The Gate Function
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
- IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
- RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
- READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
- VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
- ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- ANY wording implying success without having run verification
Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 127 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A adcdc39b47c9
sp-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository tta-lab/ttal-cli (23 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 949 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to verification-before-completion, differing in 36 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
mass-line
触发：当你需要收集多方意见、把零散反馈整合成可执行方案，或把方案带回真实使用者/执行者验证时调用；常见信号包括 stakeholder input、user feedback、意见汇总、对齐与验证。 English: Trigger when input must be gathered from many people, synthesized into a clearer plan, and returned to the affected users or executors for validation. Use this skill for a collect-synthesize-validate loop.
workflows
触发：当你面临的任务明显需要多个思想武器协作时调用；常见信号包括：从零启动新项目、攻坚复杂疑难问题、对已有方案进行迭代优化。此 skill 提供标准化的跨 skill 工作流组合，解决"应该先用哪个 skill、怎么衔接"的问题。 English: Trigger when a task clearly requires multiple skills in sequence. Use this skill to select a standard workflow that chains skills together, defines data handoff between steps, and specifies…
concentrate-forces
触发：当多个任务同时争夺时间、注意力、算力或预算，必须确定主攻方向并停止分散用力时调用；常见信号包括优先级过多、资源紧张、推进分散、需要决定先做什么。 English: Trigger when limited resources are being split across too many tasks and one main target must be chosen. Use this skill to concentrate effort, sequence work decisively, and finish a meaningful breakthrough before expanding.
protracted-strategy
触发：当目标长期、任务复杂、资源暂时处于劣势，或短期无法速胜但又不能放弃时调用；常见信号包括 long-term effort、phased plan、endurance、战略耐心、需要分阶段推进。 English: Trigger when the work is long-horizon, difficult, and unlikely to be won quickly. Use this skill to divide the effort into stages, keep strategic confidence, and accumulate small wins into overall victory.
practice-cognition
触发：当你提出了方案、假设或判断，需要通过实践验证、试错迭代或复盘升级认知时调用；常见信号包括 experiment、prototype、validate、iterate、feedback loop。 English: Trigger when an idea, hypothesis, or plan must be tested in practice and improved through iteration. Use this skill to move from action to understanding and back to action in a spiral learning loop.
contradiction-analysis
触发：当问题复杂、存在多个冲突因素、优先级不清，或你不知道应该先解决什么时调用；常见信号包括 trade-off、瓶颈、根因不明、主次不清、多个问题互相牵制。 English: Trigger when a problem contains competing forces, unclear priorities, or no obvious entry point. Use this skill to identify contradictions, isolate the principal contradiction, classify its nature, and choose the right response.