Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tutur3u/platform. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tutur3u/platform/main/.agents/skills/google-cloud-waf-reliability/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tutur3u/platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tutur3u/platform/google-cloud-waf-reliability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tutur3u/platform/google-cloud-waf-reliability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tutur3u/platform/google-cloud-waf-reliability.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01294 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00647 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00259 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
google-cloud-waf-reliability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to google-cloud-waf-reliability — 67 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework skill for the Reliability pillar
Overview
The Reliability pillar of the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework provides principles and recommendations to help you design, deploy, and manage reliable, resilient, and highly available workloads in Google Cloud. A reliable system consistently performs its intended functions under defined conditions, is resilient to failures, and recovers gracefully from disruptions, thereby minimizing downtime, enhancing user experience, and ensuring data integrity.
Core principles
The recommendations in the reliability pillar of the Well-Architected Framework are aligned with the following core principles:
-
Define reliability based on user-experience goals: Measurement of reliability should reflect the actual experience of the system's users rather than merely relying on infrastructure metrics. Focus on outcomes that matter most to users. Grounding document: https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/framework/reliability/define-reliability-based-on-user-experience-goals
-
Set realistic targets for reliability: Determine appropriate Service Level Objectives (SLOs) that balance the cost and complexity of maximizing availability against business requirements. Utilize error budgets to manage feature velocity. Grounding document: https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/framework/reliability/set-targets
-
Build highly available systems through resource redundancy: Eliminate single points of failure by duplicating critical components across zones and regions to maintain operations during localized outages. Grounding document: https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/framework/reliability/build-highly-available-systems
-
Take advantage of horizontal scalability: Design system architectures to scale horizontally (adding more instances) to seamlessly accommodate load fluctuations and improve overall fault tolerance. Grounding document: https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/framework/reliability/horizontal-scalability
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · -46 tokens per session a97e1a2350e0
- 7d ago First seen · 131 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 6da26b6c18b0
google-cloud-waf-reliability is a skill published in the GitHub repository tutur3u/platform (53 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,294 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to google-cloud-waf-reliability, differing in 67 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
magic-ui
Use this skill when users want to add, customize, or troubleshoot Magic UI components in React/Next.js projects. It covers component selection, shadcn registry installation (@magicui/), integration patterns, and practical quality checks for accessibility and maintainability.
frontend-engineer
!cat skills/shared/protocols/ux-protocol.md 2>/dev/null || true !cat skills/shared/protocols/input-validation.md 2>/dev/null || true !cat skills/shared/protocols/tool-efficiency.md 2>/dev/null || true !cat .production-grade.yaml 2>/dev/null || echo "No config — using defaults" !cat .forgewright/codebase-context.md…
migrate-radix-to-base
Migrates React projects and components from Radix UI to Base UI. Use when asked to migrate from radix, move to base-ui, convert radix primitives, or switch a shadcn project's base library. Handles single components ("migrate accordion") and whole projects.
nextjs-app-router
Full end-to-end tRPC setup for Next.js App Router. Covers route handler with fetchRequestHandler (GET + POST exports), TRPCProvider with QueryClientProvider, createTRPCOptionsProxy for RSC prefetching, HydrateClient/HydrationBoundary for hydration, useSuspenseQuery for Suspense, and server-side callers.
nextjs-pages-router
Set up tRPC in Next.js Pages Router with createNextApiHandler, createTRPCNext, withTRPC HOC, SSR via ssr option and ssrPrepass, SSG via createServerSideHelpers with getStaticProps, and server-side helpers for getServerSideProps prefetching.
links
Configure the tRPC client link chain: httpLink, httpBatchLink, httpBatchStreamLink, splitLink, loggerLink, wsLink, createWSClient, httpSubscriptionLink, unstablelocalLink, retryLink. Choose the right terminating link. Route subscriptions via splitLink. Build custom links for SOA routing. Link options: url, headers…