Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TypedDevs/bashunit --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TypedDevs/bashunitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/typeddevs/bashunit/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/typeddevs/bashunit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/typeddevs/bashunit/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/typeddevs/bashunit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/typeddevs/bashunit/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00315 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00126 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review a pull request
Resolve the supplied PR number or the current branch's PR with gh pr view. If neither identifies one, list open PRs and request a selection. For an uncommitted diff, use code-reviewer instead.
Read gh pr view <number> --json number,title,body,state,headRefName,baseRefName,url and gh pr diff <number>. Follow the applicable source rules in .agnostic-ai/AGNOSTIC_AI.md.
- Verify changed behavior, failure paths, Bash compatibility, dynamic scope, subshell state, parallel isolation and cleanup. Prefer
[ ]for ordinary tests;[[ ]]works on Bash 3.0 and is not a compatibility defect. - Check tests exercise the failure and the requested outcome. Respect process budgets and public behavior; require changelog and documentation where needed.
- For specs, check canonical sources, generated references, model resolution and preserved target behavior.
- Review read-only. Do not run the full gate, edit files, or post comments without authorization.
Report only verified defects, most severe first: path:line, severity, failing input, smallest fix. Do not add style nits or speculate. If none remain, say so and name the scope checked.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · -22 lines 2c3013c86719
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A acab61f9d754
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository TypedDevs/bashunit (435 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 315 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
compiler-commit
Use when you want to verify compiler changes and commit with the correct convention. Runs tests, lint, and format, then commits with the [compiler] or [rust-compiler] prefix.
git
Git and code hosting platform management — GitHub, GitLab, Codeberg, Forgejo. Zero barrier — install x-cmd and manage repos from the terminal. Use for "git", "github", "gitlab", "repo", "pull request", "code hosting".
vhs-e2e-gif
Record a test run, a TUI session, or any terminal command as a GIF with VHS and attach it to a GitHub PR as a release-hosted asset, never a repo commit. Use when asked to record an e2e run, demo a fix on a PR, attach a GIF or screen recording to a pull request, show a test passing visually, or produce a terminal…
gh-pr
This skill should be used when creating a GitHub pull request via gh pr create. Covers the gh CLI mechanics; PR title and body conventions come from the pr-style skill.
ring:creating-worktrees
Creating an isolated git worktree for parallel branch work: selects the directory by priority order, verifies/adds .gitignore safety, auto-installs the detected toolchain's dependencies, runs a baseline test, and reports readiness. Use before a feature that needs isolation from the main workspace or before executing…
056-design-avoid-breaking-changes
Use when you need to review a plan, OpenSpec change, specification, or implementation proposal for breaking-change risk across commands, skills, generated outputs, XML sources, README/docs, tests, CI, APIs, schemas, configuration, data, migration, and release guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Review…