Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to u9401066/med-paper-assistant. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/master/.claude/skills/literature-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01564 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00782 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00313 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
literature-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
系統性文獻回顧
適用：新研究專案 | Introduction 前調查 | 系統性回顧 | PICO 臨床問題
不適用：快速查一篇 → 直接 unified_search | 只需整理 → format_references
工具速查
pubmed-search MCP
| 類別 | 工具 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|
| 搜尋 | unified_search |
主要文獻搜尋入口 |
generate_search_queries |
MeSH + 同義詞材料 | |
parse_pico |
解析 PICO 臨床問題 | |
read_session(action="pmids") |
取回 PMID + 去重 | |
| 探索 | find_related_articles / find_citing_articles / get_article_references |
引用網路 |
get_citation_metrics |
iCite RCR 排序 | |
| 全文 | get_fulltext(pmcid) |
取得 OA 全文 |
analyze_fulltext_access(pmids) |
確認 OA 狀態 | |
| Session | read_session(action="pmids") / get_session_log |
取回搜尋結果 |
| 匯出 | prepare_export |
RIS/BibTeX |
asset-aware-mcp（全文解析）
| 類別 | 工具 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|
| 解析 | ingest_documents(file_paths) |
PDF 結構化解析（雙引擎） |
parse_pdf_structure(file_path) |
Marker 高精度解析 | |
| 狀態 | get_job_status(job_id) |
追蹤非同步處理進度 |
| 瀏覽 | inspect_document_manifest(doc_id) |
取得完整資產清單 |
list_section_tree(doc_id) |
文件章節結構 | |
| 提取 | get_section_content(doc_id, section_path) |
取得特定段落內容 |
fetch_document_asset(doc_id, asset_type, asset_id) |
取得圖表等資產 | |
| 知識圖 | consult_knowledge_graph(query) |
跨文獻 RAG 查詢 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 85 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 2eeb4dec7d7b
literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository u9401066/med-paper-assistant (12 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,564 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
read
Read PDF page by page with structured output — key arguments, terms glossary, thesis connections. Use when reading academic papers, books, or articles.
release-governance
Use when preparing, auditing, releasing, PDF-hardening, or rebuttal-hardening academic manuscripts, datasets, artifacts, reviewer packets, or claim registers involving multiple refs, local assets, human labels, agent-assisted drafts, wide tables, figure provenance, submission PDFs, or evidence-boundary checks.
proposal-import
Import an existing proposal (usually PDF) into the standard single-file format — extract text and references, strip personal data, mark gaps. Use when the user has a draft from Word, LaTeX, Overleaf or another tool, pastes the text of an older proposal, or wants to carry existing work over and continue it here.
proposal-publish
Build a PDF (or docx fallback) from a proposal file via pandoc — compact layout, typst-first, with install guidance when tools are missing. Also offers a stripped hand-in export, and hands over to a workspace build script where one exists. Use when the user wants a PDF or something to email, print or hand to their…
book-to-skill
Book-to-skill takes technical books, documentation, or other long-form sources and converts them into a skill made of a core definition plus per-chapter files, a glossary, and cheatsheets, so an agent can load only the relevant section instead of the whole document. It supports PDF, EPUB, DOCX, HTML, and several other…
tikz-figure-review
Review and fix alignment, label collision, clipping, legend-over-data, overlap, and layout issues in TikZ and pgfplots figures inside LaTeX documents. Use when the user wants to review figures in a paper, tutorial, lecture notes, or thesis before submission; when a reviewer flags figure problems; when a rendered…