Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to u9401066/pharmacy-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/u9401066/pharmacy-mcp/main/.claude/skills/code-reviewer/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/u9401066/pharmacy-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/pharmacy-mcp/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/pharmacy-mcp/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/pharmacy-mcp/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00386 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to code-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
name: code-reviewer description: Comprehensive code review checking quality, security, and best practices. Triggers: CR, review, 審查, 檢查, check, 看一下, PR, code review, 品質.
程式碼審查技能
描述
對程式碼進行全面審查，檢查品質、安全性和最佳實踐。
觸發條件
- 「review 這段程式碼」
- 「檢查程式碼」
- 「code review」
審查項目
1. 程式碼品質
- 命名是否清晰
- 函數長度是否合理（建議 < 50 行）
- 是否遵循 DRY 原則
- 複雜度是否過高
2. 安全性
- SQL 注入風險
- XSS 漏洞
- 敏感資料暴露
- 權限檢查
3. 效能
- N+1 查詢問題
- 不必要的迴圈
- 記憶體洩漏風險
4. 可維護性
- 註解是否充足
- 錯誤處理是否完整
- 測試覆蓋率
輸出格式
## 審查結果
### ✅ 優點
- ...
### ⚠️ 建議改進
- [嚴重程度] 問題描述
- 位置：第 X 行
- 建議：...
### 📊 評分
- 品質：X/10
- 安全：X/10
- 效能：X/10
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 58 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c214a3874212
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository u9401066/pharmacy-mcp (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 386 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…