Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add u9401066/template-is-all-you-need --skill code-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/u9401066/template-is-all-you-needWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.02456 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00982 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00491 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00246 |
Grade A, and why
code-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 295 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
深度程式碼審計
描述
對整個程式庫進行系統性的深度審計，涵蓋程式碼品質、安全性、架構合規性、測試覆蓋率和文檔同步度。比 code-reviewer（單檔審查）和 code-review-workflow（PR 審查）更全面，適合定期健檢。
觸發條件
- 「程式碼審計」「AUDIT」「全面審查」
- 「deep review」「深度審查」「健檢」
- 「codebase audit」「完整檢查」
法規依據
- 憲法：CONSTITUTION.md 第一章（DDD 架構）
- 子法：bylaws/ddd-architecture.md
- 子法：bylaws/git-workflow.md
🔧 審計流程（5 大維度）
Phase 1: 🏗️ 架構合規性審計
目標：驗證 DDD 分層架構是否被正確遵守
# 檢查目錄結構
Get-ChildItem -Path src/ -Directory -Recurse | Select-Object FullName
檢查清單：
| 項目 | 檢查方式 | 嚴重度 |
|---|---|---|
| Domain 層無外部依賴 | grep_search Domain 層的 import |
🔴 Critical |
| Repository Interface 在 Domain | 檢查 interfaces 位置 | 🔴 Critical |
| 依賴方向正確 | 分析 import 圖 | 🔴 Critical |
| Application 層不過度膨脹 | 計算行數 | 🟡 Medium |
| Presentation 只呼叫 Application | 檢查 import | 🟠 High |
# 偵測 Domain 層違規 import 的搜尋模式
# ❌ Domain 層不應出現這些：
import_violations = [
"from fastapi",
"from flask",
"from sqlalchemy",
"from django",
"import requests",
"from infrastructure",
"from presentation",
]
Phase 2: 📊 程式碼品質審計
自動化工具：
# Ruff - 全面 linting
uv run ruff check src/ --output-format=grouped --statistics
# Ruff - 格式檢查
uv run ruff format --check src/
# MyPy - 型別安全
uv run mypy src/ --ignore-missing-imports --show-error-codes
# Vulture - 死碼偵測
uv run vulture src/ --min-confidence 80
# 圈複雜度
uv run ruff check src/ --select=C901 --output-format=concise
人工檢查項目：
| 指標 | 閾值 | 工具 |
|---|---|---|
| 函數長度 | < 50 行 | grep + 人工 |
| 類別大小 | < 300 行 | grep + 人工 |
| 圈複雜度 | McCabe < 10 | ruff C901 |
| 重複程式碼 | 無明顯重複 | semantic_search |
| 命名一致性 | snake_case/CamelCase | ruff |
| 型別覆蓋率 | 公開 API 100% | mypy |
Phase 3: 🔒 安全性審計
呼叫 security-reviewer skill 執行 OWASP Top 10 檢查
# Bandit - 靜態安全分析
uv run bandit -r src/ -ll -f txt
# 依賴漏洞
uv run pip-audit 2>/dev/null || echo "pip-audit 未安裝"
# Secrets 偵測
git log --all --diff-filter=A -- "*.env" "*.key" "*.pem" 2>/dev/null || true
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 295 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A fbbfaae39326
code-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository u9401066/template-is-all-you-need (3 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 2,456 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
powershell-refactor
Refactor existing PowerShell scripts to simplify flow, reduce duplication, standardize naming and structure, and tighten behavior without changing the intended outcome.
code-review-architecture
Architecture-focused code review covering hexagonal boundary violations, DDD anti-patterns, CQRS misuse, and microservices coupling issues. Applied in addition to the language-specific review skill when architecture markers are detected. Invoked when reviewing hexagonal architectures, DDD patterns, or microservices…
lint
You are a code quality engineer. Auto-detect the linting stack, run it, fix all errors. Zero errors before done.
ledger-audit
Retrospective pass over a project built before the ledger existed: reconstruct the structural decisions already made and the conventions applied without a reason. (decision-ledger).
ledger-report
Mastery map for this project: which areas of the codebase are defended, which are thin. Run it at a commit, a pull request, or on request. (decision-ledger).
Code Review Checklist
Runs a systematic checklist review on any code diff or file, covering correctness, security, performance, and readability.