Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add u9401066/template-is-all-you-need --skill code-review-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/u9401066/template-is-all-you-needWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-review-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-review-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/template-is-all-you-need/code-review-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01538 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00769 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00308 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- code-review-workflow — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
程式碼審查工作流
描述
完整的 PR/MR 審查流程，整合自動化檢查和多維度審查。
觸發條件
- 「審查 PR」「review PR」「審查流程」
- 「PRW: [PR 連結或分支]」
🔍 審查流程
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Code Review Workflow │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 1: 📋 概覽 (Overview) │
│ ├─ 列出變更檔案 │
│ ├─ 統計變更行數 │
│ └─ 識別變更範圍 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 2: 🤖 自動化檢查 (Automated) │
│ ├─ 靜態分析 (ruff, mypy) │
│ ├─ 死碼檢測 (vulture) │
│ ├─ 安全掃描 (bandit) │
│ └─ 測試執行 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 3: 🏗️ 架構審查 (Architecture) │
│ ├─ [ddd-architect] DDD 合規檢查 │
│ ├─ 依賴方向驗證 │
│ └─ 模組化評估 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 4: 🔒 安全審查 (Security) │
│ ├─ [security-reviewer] OWASP 檢查 │
│ ├─ 敏感資料偵測 │
│ └─ 認證/授權審查 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 5: 📝 程式碼審查 (Code) │
│ ├─ [code-reviewer] 品質審查 │
│ ├─ 可讀性評估 │
│ ├─ 效能考量 │
│ └─ 測試覆蓋率 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 6: 📊 總結 (Summary) │
│ ├─ 生成審查報告 │
│ ├─ 建議修改項目 │
│ └─ 批准/請求修改 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 182 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 65db84ccee47
code-review-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository u9401066/template-is-all-you-need (3 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,538 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pull-feedback
Use when the user has authored a GitHub pull request and wants to work through review feedback on it. Triggers on phrases like "pull down the review on.
inbox
Use when checking what PRs are waiting for your review, or when starting your day to see what needs attention.
checking-for-undisclosed-context
Use when reviewing or drafting a doc, PR/issue description, design doc, code-review prompt, or subagent persona that's supposed to stand on its own, to check whether it leans on vocabulary, acronyms, or structure pulled from other documentation or conversation the reader hasn't seen. Read it cold, as the specific…
code-auditing
A code review and auditing guide with several modes for finding problems, simplifying code, or combining multiple review viewpoints. It includes instructions written partly in Chinese.
review-workflow-management
This skill reviews the HTTP management endpoints (start, status, terminate, pause, resume, raise-event, purge) that an app exposes for Dapr Workflows. Use this skill when the user asks to "review workflow management", "audit workflow management API", "check workflow HTTP endpoints", or similar.
review-agent-tools
This skill reviews agent tool implementations for idempotency, input validation, docstring quality, and convention violations. Use this skill when the user asks to "review agent tools", "check tool idempotency", "audit Dapr agent tools", or similar.