Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins --skill invention-intakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uk-agents/uk-legal-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/invention-intake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/invention-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/invention-intake/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/invention-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/invention-intake.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.04973 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.02486 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00995 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00497 |
Grade C, and why
invention-intake scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Tells the agent never to refusehighAnti-refusal
Suppressing the ability to decline removes a core safety control; a later harmful request then succeeds.
> **UK/EPO vs. US.** The US §101/*Alice/Mayo* framework is materially different from UK/EPO. An invention that screens 🔴 under *Alice* may be eligible under UK/EPO practice. An invention that seems clear under UK/EPO ma How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 388 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/invention-intake
This is a first-pass screen by a non-specialist, not a patentability opinion. The screen never concludes that an invention is patentable — it concludes that it passes the initial screen and warrants a prior-art search and Chartered Patent Attorney review, that it needs more information, or that it hits a disqualifier. A prior-art search is a separate step; this skill does not do one.
Instructions
- Read
~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/ip-legal-uk/CLAUDE.md. If it contains[PLACEHOLDER], stop and direct to/ip-legal-uk:cold-start-interview. If the practice profile shows trade mark- or copyright-only (no patent practice), say so and route the user elsewhere — this is the wrong tool. - Follow the workflow below.
- Run intake. If the user pasted or uploaded a disclosure, read it. If not, ask the seven intake questions in one batch and wait.
- Run the six screens: novelty signals, obviousness flags, subject-matter eligibility (PA 1977 s.1(2) + Aerotel/Macrossan), public disclosure / bar dates, detectability, strategic value. Each screen gets a ✓ / 🟡 / 🔴 verdict with one-line reasoning.
- Write the invention screen memo to the matter folder (if a matter is active) or the practice outputs folder. Apply the work-product header per role.
- Bottom-line verdict: PURSUE (schedule prior-art search and Chartered Patent Attorney review) / INVESTIGATE (needs more info on a specific open item) / DECLINE (state the concrete reason). Never say "patentable."
- Close with the decision tree and the non-lawyer gate if the role is non-lawyer.
- If the screen hit a public disclosure with UK / foreign rights in scope, flag at the top: time-sensitive. UK and EPO practice apply absolute novelty with limited exceptions — there is very little grace period.
This skill never concludes that an invention is patentable. If uncertain, flag — a Chartered Patent Attorney decides.
Examples
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 388 lines · 77 tokens per session scan C eb1ffa9722ae
invention-intake is a skill published in the GitHub repository uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins (9 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 4,973 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (tells the agent never to refuse). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
brand-safety-compliance
Scans outbound copy or creator-submitted content for 6 compliance red lines — medical/efficacy, exaggeration/absolute, beauty-permanence, financial/income, fake-scarcity, fake-rapport — and returns a block/warn verdict with fix suggestions. Use when the user asks to check, scan, review, or vet copy before sending, or…
postgres
Use this skill for any PostgreSQL database work — table design, indexing, data types, constraints, extensions (pgvector, PostGIS, TimescaleDB), search, and migrations. Trigger when user asks to: Design or modify PostgreSQL tables, schemas, or data models Choose data types, constraints, indexes, or partitioning…
employment-compliance
Covers the employment rules that carry real penalties — exempt and non-exempt classification, overtime and hours, employee versus contractor status, work authorization and recordkeeping, accommodation requests, and the notices and retention obligations that go with them. Use this to classify a role, review a…
revenue-recognition
Determines when and how revenue is recognized — performance obligations, contract terms that change the answer, and the deal structures that create accounting problems. Use this to work out how a contract should be recognized, review a non-standard deal before it is signed, understand deferred revenue, or spot terms…
privacy-and-data-protection
Assesses and improves how personal data is collected, used, shared, and retained — data mapping, lawful basis, consent, processor agreements, subject rights, and breach obligations. Use this before launching anything that handles personal data, when adding a vendor that will process it, when a data subject request…
benefits-and-leave
Designs and runs employee benefits and leave — health and retirement plans, leave policy, cost and renewal, and the administration that keeps them compliant. Use this to design or review a benefits package, prepare for a renewal, write leave policy, handle a leave request, or decide what benefits are worth their cost.