Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins --skill launch-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uk-agents/uk-legal-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/launch-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/launch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/launch-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/launch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/launch-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.04580 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.01832 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00916 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00458 |
Grade A, and why
launch-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 266 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/launch-review
- Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/product-legal-uk/CLAUDE.md→ framework + calibration. Stop if placeholders. - Get PRD + related docs. If tracker connected, pull ticket and comments.
- Walk every framework category using the workflow below.
- Calibrate each finding against the table. Novel = flag explicitly.
- Output review memo in house format. Post summary to ticket if connected.
- Hand off: marketing-claims-review if substantial marketing; feature-risk-assessment if a finding needs depth.
/product-legal-uk:launch-review PROJ-1234
Matter context
Matter context. Check ## Matter workspaces in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If Enabled is ✗ (the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run /product-legal-uk:matter-workspace switch <slug> or say practice-level." Load the active matter's matter.md for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at ~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/product-legal-uk/matters/<matter-slug>/. Never read another matter's files unless Cross-matter context is on.
Destination check
Before producing output, check where it's going. If the user has named a destination (a channel, a distribution list, a counterparty, "everyone"), ask whether it's inside the legal professional privilege circle. Public channels, company-wide lists, counterparty/opposing counsel, vendors, and clients (for legal advice) can break privilege. When the destination looks outside the circle, flag it and offer (a) the privileged version for legal only, (b) a sanitised version for the broader channel, or (c) both.
Purpose
Read the PRD, check every category in this team's framework, calibrate against what actually blocks here (per ~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/product-legal-uk/CLAUDE.md), and output a review in house format. Goal: a PM reads it and knows exactly what has to happen before they ship — under UK law.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 266 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A a913502d6767
launch-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins (14 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 4,580 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
67-agency-vendor-brief
Dung khi thue NGUOI NGOAI lam — agency, freelancer, production house, vendor: scope of work, spec deliverable, so vong sua, quy trinh duyet, moc thanh toan, dieu khoan IP va bao mat, bang danh gia vendor sau du an. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'brief agency', 'thue freelancer', 'quan ly vendor', 'scope of work', 'agency…
performance-management
Runs performance systems that change behavior — expectations, feedback, review cycles, calibration, and handling underperformance. Use this to design or fix a review process, run calibration, write or coach on feedback, address sustained underperformance, or work out why reviews consume weeks and change nothing.
feature-prioritization
RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, and value-effort prioritization frameworks with scoring methodologies and decision documentation. Use when prioritizing features, evaluating competing initiatives, creating roadmaps, or making build vs defer decisions.
batch-process
Batch-produce many content pieces as one resumable queue, highest priority first. "write these 15 posts".
litigation-workflow
Civil litigation workflow expertise — case management, deposition prep, evidence chain, and Federal Rules of Evidence.
construction-management
Estimating, scheduling, building codes, safety protocols, permitting, and project controls.