Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins --skill memogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uk-agents/uk-legal-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/memo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/memo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/memo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/memo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/memo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.02357 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01179 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00471 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00236 |
Grade A, and why
memo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 205 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/legal-clinic-uk:memo
- Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/legal-clinic-uk/CLAUDE.md→ practice areas, jurisdiction. - Use the workflow below. Read intake summary / case notes.
- Frame issues as questions. Scaffold IRAC for each — Rule blocks are RESEARCH NEEDED, Application is STUDENT ANALYSIS prompts, Conclusion is blank.
- Strengths/weaknesses/open questions. Research gaps summary.
- Output with prominent "the analysis is yours" label. OSCOLA citation format throughout.
/legal-clinic-uk:memo
Memo: Internal Case Analysis
Purpose
The case analysis memo is where the student's thinking lives. This skill provides the IRAC scaffolding and flags the research gaps — the student fills in the analysis.
The analysis is the student's. This skill structures; it doesn't conclude.
Citations in this skill follow OSCOLA (Oxford University Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities). Citation starts are provided in OSCOLA format as a research orientation; they are explicitly unverified and must be checked before use.
Load context
~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/legal-clinic-uk/CLAUDE.md → practice areas, jurisdiction (E&W / Scotland / NI), supervision style.
Intake summary and case notes for facts.
Pedagogy check
Read the supervisor guide for this practice area at ~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/legal-clinic-uk/guides/<practice-area>.md. Check the pedagogy_posture setting:
guide(default): Produce the IRAC structure and the research-gap list. Ask the student to draft each rule statement themselves from research. Give feedback on what they wrote. Offer to fill the framework rule for a section only when the student has tried once.assist: Produce the memo scaffold and fill what can be filled. The[STUDENT ANALYSIS]and[STUDENT CONCLUSION]blocks remain blank by design —assistfills the IRAC scaffold and framework rule statement; it does not produce the application or the conclusion.teach: Don't produce the framework or the scaffold content. Ask the student to frame the issues, state the rules from their research, and do the application. Give feedback. Ask leading questions when they're stuck.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 205 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A c83b7947af9b
memo is a skill published in the GitHub repository uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins (9 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,357 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
brand-safety-compliance
Scans outbound copy or creator-submitted content for 6 compliance red lines — medical/efficacy, exaggeration/absolute, beauty-permanence, financial/income, fake-scarcity, fake-rapport — and returns a block/warn verdict with fix suggestions. Use when the user asks to check, scan, review, or vet copy before sending, or…
ask
Answer a question from a finished study, citing back into its evidence, and say plainly when the study does not cover it.
compare
Set two term tables against each other — same concept different term, same term different concept, and what each covers that the other lacks.
enablement-course
Assemble an internal AI enablement course for a company's own employees, sized to where they actually are rather than where a vendor deck assumes they are. Produces the session plan, per-session content and exercises, a facilitator guide for a non-expert, and a way to tell whether it worked. Builds on the tech stack…
study-deps
Use when pulling upstream source or cloning a dependency at its installed version to study internals, read code, or create pinned worktrees.
brief
Use when confusion is only “huh,” “wait, what,” “sorry, you lost me,” or “slow down; explain simply and keep it short.”.