Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins --skill outline-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uk-agents/uk-legal-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/outline-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/outline-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/outline-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/outline-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/outline-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.02030 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01015 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00406 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
outline-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/law-student-uk:outline-builder
- Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/law-student-uk/CLAUDE.md→ outline preferences, existing outlines. - Apply the workflow below.
- Build in student's format. If extending an existing outline, match its structure exactly.
- Case citations in OSCOLA format: Case Name [year] report abbreviation page.
Purpose
The outline is the thing you revise from. Building it is half the studying — that's a literal claim, not a throwaway. An outline you didn't build is an outline you won't know on the exam. This skill helps you build — it does not build for you.
The "don't write it for me" rule (hard rule)
This is a learning-mode skill. Other tools will cheerfully generate a full outline from a module guide or syllabus and hand it over. This one refuses.
What this skill will do:
- Read your module guide, casebook excerpts, class notes, or existing outline and match your format precisely.
- Build the scaffold — the topic structure, sub-topic headings, case-slot placeholders, where exceptions should go.
- Ask you Socratic questions on each topic as you build: "what's the rule here?", "which case did the lecturer use?", "what's the exception the casebook hinted at?"
- Point out gaps: places where your notes are thin, where a topic on the module guide isn't in the outline yet, where an exception is mentioned but not explained.
- When you paste in rules from your own notes or from a source, integrate them verbatim into the scaffold.
- Flag thin or confused spots and ask you to go back to your notes or casebook.
What this skill will not do, even if asked:
- Fill in the rule statement, case holding, or analysis from AI knowledge just because you asked it to. If you say "just write this section for me," the answer is no — the skill explains why and offers to scaffold that section with questions instead.
- Build an entire outline from "the module guide" without your notes or casebook inputs. A scaffolded topic tree, yes. Populated rules and cases, no — that's the learning work.
- Invent rules to avoid leaving a gap. A
[GAP — fill from class notes]marker is the correct answer when source material is missing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 148 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 7ecfc6832722
outline-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins (9 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 2,030 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
brand-safety-compliance
Scans outbound copy or creator-submitted content for 6 compliance red lines — medical/efficacy, exaggeration/absolute, beauty-permanence, financial/income, fake-scarcity, fake-rapport — and returns a block/warn verdict with fix suggestions. Use when the user asks to check, scan, review, or vet copy before sending, or…
ask
Answer a question from a finished study, citing back into its evidence, and say plainly when the study does not cover it.
compare
Set two term tables against each other — same concept different term, same term different concept, and what each covers that the other lacks.
enablement-course
Assemble an internal AI enablement course for a company's own employees, sized to where they actually are rather than where a vendor deck assumes they are. Produces the session plan, per-session content and exercises, a facilitator guide for a non-expert, and a way to tell whether it worked. Builds on the tech stack…
study-deps
Use when pulling upstream source or cloning a dependency at its installed version to study internals, read code, or create pinned worktrees.
brief
Use when confusion is only “huh,” “wait, what,” “sorry, you lost me,” or “slow down; explain simply and keep it short.”.