Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins --skill supervisor-review-queuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uk-agents/uk-legal-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/supervisor-review-queue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/supervisor-review-queue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/supervisor-review-queue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/supervisor-review-queue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/supervisor-review-queue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.01364 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00546 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
supervisor-review-queue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/legal-clinic-uk:supervisor-review-queue
- Check
~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/legal-clinic-uk/CLAUDE.md→ supervision style. If NOT "formal review queue": explain the clinic is set up for [flags/lighter-touch], no formal queue exists, and how to switch. - Use the workflow below.
- Default: show what's waiting, by urgency, by student.
- Actions: approve / edit-then-approve / return with note. All logged.
/legal-clinic-uk:supervisor-review-queue
/legal-clinic-uk:supervisor-review-queue --approve Q-003
/legal-clinic-uk:supervisor-review-queue --return Q-004 "Check the ET1 grounds — the protected disclosure argument needs more detail on the qualifying disclosure under ERA 1996 s 43B"
Supervisor Review Queue (Optional)
Purpose
Some UK law school clinics want a formal gate: student drafts, supervisor reviews, output releases. Others find that too prescriptive — they supervise through case rounds and one-on-ones, not through a queue.
This skill is only active if ~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/legal-clinic-uk/CLAUDE.md → Supervision style is "formal review queue." Otherwise it's dormant.
Whether to use a formal review workflow is genuinely an open question for clinic adoption. It depends on student experience level, caseload, and how the supervisor already runs supervision. The supervisor decides at setup and can change it later.
SRA/BSB compliance record. Under the SRA Code of Conduct 2019 and BSB Handbook, the supervising solicitor or barrister is responsible for work done by students acting under their supervision. The review queue log is a record that a licensed supervising solicitor or barrister reviewed student work before it went to a client or was filed with a court or tribunal. That record matters for the clinic's own compliance and for student evaluation. [SRA-CODE] [BSB-HANDBOOK]
Load context
~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/legal-clinic-uk/CLAUDE.md → supervision style. If NOT "formal review queue": respond with "The clinic is set up for [flags/lighter-touch] supervision — there's no formal queue. [Supervisor] reviews through [the clinic's existing structure]. To switch to a formal queue, edit CLAUDE.md → Supervision style."
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 118 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 38c29d2f722f
supervisor-review-queue is a skill published in the GitHub repository uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins (14 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 1,364 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
brand-safety-compliance
Scans outbound copy or creator-submitted content for 6 compliance red lines — medical/efficacy, exaggeration/absolute, beauty-permanence, financial/income, fake-scarcity, fake-rapport — and returns a block/warn verdict with fix suggestions. Use when the user asks to check, scan, review, or vet copy before sending, or…
c2pa-metadata
Embed C2PA provenance in AI-generated images, video or PDF by script. "add content credentials to this asset".
timescaledb-hyperfunctions
Use this skill when writing analytical SQL over time-series data with the TimescaleDB Toolkit (timescaledbtoolkit extension) hyperfunctions: approximate percentiles, statistical summaries, time-weighted averages, counter/gauge rates, uptime/heartbeat tracking, state durations, OHLC candlesticks, approximate distinct…
postgres
Use this skill for any PostgreSQL database work — table design, indexing, data types, constraints, extensions (pgvector, PostGIS, TimescaleDB), search, and migrations. Trigger when user asks to: Explore an existing PostgreSQL database to understand its objects and relationships Design or modify PostgreSQL tables…
revenue-recognition
Determines when and how revenue is recognized — performance obligations, contract terms that change the answer, and the deal structures that create accounting problems. Use this to work out how a contract should be recognized, review a non-standard deal before it is signed, understand deferred revenue, or spot terms…
compensation-and-leveling
Builds and maintains the leveling framework and pay structure — level definitions, salary bands, benchmarking, pay equity, and how raises and promotions are decided. Use this to design or revise leveling, set or adjust salary bands, benchmark against market, handle a compensation request or counteroffer, run a review…