Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ukonduru91/spark-history-mcp --skill spark-optimizationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ukonduru91/spark-history-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ukonduru91/spark-history-mcp/spark-optimization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ukonduru91/spark-history-mcp/spark-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ukonduru91/spark-history-mcp/spark-optimization/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ukonduru91/spark-history-mcp/spark-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ukonduru91/spark-history-mcp/spark-optimization.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00162 | $0.02179 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.01090 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00436 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
spark-optimization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 212 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spark performance optimization
Most Spark tuning advice on the internet is a list of settings. That is the wrong shape: the same setting helps one job and hurts the next. What actually works is finding the one stage that dominates the runtime, learning what it is waiting on, and changing that.
The History Server has the evidence to do this properly — per-task metric distributions, per-node SQL plan counters, executor timelines. This skill is about extracting it in a fixed order so the recommendation is derived rather than guessed.
The rule that matters most
Quantify before recommending. Every recommendation should carry the number that justifies it and, where possible, the expected size of the win:
Stage 14 spilled 8.2 GB to disk across 200 tasks and accounts for 62% of wall-clock time. Raising
spark.sql.shuffle.partitionsfrom 200 to 800 puts each partition near 128 MB and should eliminate the spill.
Not:
Consider increasing shuffle partitions and executor memory.
A recommendation without a measurement is a guess, and engineers can tell.
Workflow
1. Frame the run
list_applications(app_id="<id>")
get_executor_summary(app_id="<id>")
Get the total duration and the executor totals: task count, GC time, input bytes, shuffle read/write. This is your denominator — everything later is a share of it.
Two derived numbers to compute immediately:
- GC ratio =
total_gc_time / total_duration. Above ~0.10 means memory pressure is a first-order problem and will distort everything else. - Shuffle-to-input ratio =
total_shuffle_write / total_input_bytes. Well above 1 means the query moves more data than it reads — usually a join or aggregation strategy problem, and the highest-leverage thing to fix.
2. Find where the time actually goes
get_job_bottlenecks(app_id="<id>", top_n=10)
One call that returns the slowest stages and jobs, stages with significant
memory spill, the GC pressure ratio and executor utilisation. Treat its
recommendations as leads, not conclusions — they are threshold-based and do not
know your data.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 212 lines · 162 tokens per session scan A d40359a057e3
spark-optimization is a skill published in the GitHub repository ukonduru91/spark-history-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 162 tokens to every session and 2,179 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…