Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add umbraco/Umbraco-MCP-Base --skill add-evalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/umbraco/Umbraco-MCP-BaseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/add-eval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/add-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/add-eval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/add-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/umbraco/umbraco-mcp-base/add-eval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01038 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00519 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00208 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
add-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Add Eval
Add or update an LLM eval test for a specific tool or collection. This skill creates a new eval scenario or updates an existing one to cover new tools.
Use this skill when:
- You added a new tool with
/add-tooland want eval coverage - You modified a tool and need to update the eval scenario
- You want to add a new workflow scenario to an existing collection
/build-evalsskipped the collection because eval files already exist
Prerequisites
Before running, ensure:
- The collection exists (
src/umbraco-api/tools/{collection}/index.ts) - The project builds:
npm run build - An LLM API key is available (eval tests use Claude Agent SDK — works with a Claude Code subscription or
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY)
Arguments
- Collection name (required): the collection to add eval coverage for (e.g.
/add-eval form) - Tool or scenario hint (optional): what to test (e.g.
/add-eval form "copy form workflow")
If no hint is provided, compare the tools in the collection against existing eval test coverage and suggest what's missing.
Agents
| Agent | When to use |
|---|---|
eval-test-creator |
Creating or updating eval test files (Step 3 or 4) |
Critical Rules
BUILD BEFORE RUNNING. Eval tests run against dist/index.js. Always npm run build first.
RUN COMMANDS SEPARATELY. Always run build and test as separate Bash calls. Never chain with &&.
ITERATE ON PROMPTS. Eval tests are probabilistic. If a test fails, the fix is usually in the prompt.
VERBOSE DURING DEVELOPMENT. Always set verbose: true when creating or debugging.
Workflow
Step 0: Check Eval Infrastructure
Check if the eval setup exists:
tests/evals/helpers/e2e-setup.tstests/evals/jest.config.ts
If the setup doesn't exist, tell the user to run /build-evals {collection} first to create the infrastructure. This skill does not create eval setup files.
Step 1: Understand Current Coverage
Read the collection's tools and existing eval tests:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 131 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 638199560039
add-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository umbraco/Umbraco-MCP-Base (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,038 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
cli-eval
Create and run evaluation suites, watch live benchmark progress, view scorecards, compare model performance, and integrate eval runs with CI workflows from the CLI.
model-merging
Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task…
merger-model
Build accretion/dilution analysis for M&A transactions. Models pro forma EPS impact, synergy sensitivities, and purchase price allocation. Use when evaluating a potential acquisition, preparing merger consequences analysis for a pitch, or advising on deal terms. Triggers on "merger model", "accretion dilution", "M&A…
darwinian-evolver
Evolve prompts/regex/SQL/code with Imbue's evolution loop.
validate
Validate Semantica pipelines, extraction quality, graph schemas, and ontology consistency. Returns structured error/warning checklists. Uses PipelineValidator, PipelineBuilder.validatepipeline(), GraphValidator, and OntologyValidator. Sub-commands: pipeline, step, dependencies, extraction, graph, ontology, performance.
launching-evals
Run, monitor, analyze, and debug LLM evaluations via nemo-evaluator-launcher. Covers running evaluations, checking status and live progress, debugging failed runs, exporting artifacts and logs, and analyzing results. ALWAYS triggers on mentions of running evaluations, checking progress, debugging failed evals…