auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing

auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing is a skill for Claude Code from UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills. It costs 209 tokens per session (2,321 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A web-security audit for clickjacking, an attack where another site places your authenticated page under misleading content and tricks someone into clicking it. It checks whether sensitive pages can be embedded by untrusted sites and whether important actions are too easy to trigger.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review sensitive web pages and one-click state-changing actions for iframe embedding, frame restrictions, and clickjacking-resistant confirmations.
Why use it?
It finds cases where an attacker could cause a logged-in user to change settings, approve something, or make a purchase without knowing what they clicked. It focuses on missing browser protections such as frame restrictions and weak confirmation steps.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the security-agent-skills plugin — 194 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to review sensitive web pages and one-click state-changing actions for iframe embedding, frame restrictions, and clickjacking-resistant confirmations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills --skill auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install security-agent-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 194 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 209 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,321 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00209 $0.02321
Opus 5.5 $0.00084 $0.00928
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00042 $0.00464
Haiku 4.5 $0.00021 $0.00232

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 39c3f7a578a5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing/SKILL.md · 145 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Auditing clickjacking and UI redressing: the user clicks your button on the attacker's page

Clickjacking works because the browser will happily render your real, authenticated page inside a frame on someone else's site, and the user cannot tell. The attacker loads your page in a transparent or hidden iframe, positions it under decoy content, and lures the user into clicking what looks like the attacker's button, when the click actually lands on your page, taken with the user's own session. So any sensitive, state-changing action that a single click can trigger, changing a setting, confirming a purchase, granting an approval, connecting an account, is exposed if your page can be framed by another origin. The defense is to refuse framing by untrusted origins, with a Content-Security-Policy frame-ancestors directive (and the older X-Frame-Options as a fallback), and, for the highest-value actions, to not make them one-click blind: a confirmation the overlay cannot fake. Related redressing tricks, drag-and-drop and keystroke capture, exploit the same framing to steal input. The audit checks, for every sensitive page, whether it can be framed and whether its state-changing actions are reachable by a single hidden click. You audit this by trying to frame the real page from another origin and drive its actions.

When to use

  • A web page performs authenticated, state-changing actions triggerable by a click (settings, purchase, approval, connect, delete).
  • The page may lack a frame-ancestors CSP directive or X-Frame-Options, so another origin can frame it.
  • A sensitive action may be one-click with no confirmation an overlay cannot hide.

Scope check

Audit clickjacking only on applications you own or are authorized to assess. Framing the real site to demonstrate the attack uses a real authenticated session, so use test accounts and your own attacker-page test harness and never trick a real user or act on an account that is not yours. If you can't name the authorization, stop.

Read the full file on GitHub · 145 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 145 lines · 209 tokens per session scan A 39c3f7a578a5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

auditing-clickjacking-and-ui-redressing is a skill published in the GitHub repository UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 209 tokens to every session and 2,321 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

prodcheck-review

Review this codebase against the prodcheck pre-production checklists — security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch readiness and people. Use when asked to check whether a project is ready to ship, to audit an area before launch, or to work through a specific checklist. Produces evidence with file:line…

FarzamHabibi/pre-production-checklist · 72 tokens

integrate-arcjet-guard-genkit

Integrate Arcjet security into a Genkit JS agent using @arcjet/guard — wrap ai.defineTool, put guardMiddleware on generate({ use }) for unwrapped / MCP / filesystem tools, and read a caller-owned id from generate({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to genkit, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or…

arcjet/arcjet-js · 89 tokens

integrate-arcjet-guard-tanstack-ai

Integrate Arcjet security into a TanStack AI chat() app using @arcjet/guard — put guardMiddleware first on chat({ middleware }) so onBeforeToolCall gates tools, and read a caller-owned id from chat({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to TanStack AI, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or block prompt…

arcjet/arcjet-js · 103 tokens

integrate-arcjet-guard-claude-managed-agents

Integrate Arcjet security into Claude Managed Agents (hosted REST+SSE, beta managed-agents-2026-04-01) using @arcjet/guard — screen user.message / initialevents before sessions.events.send, and gate custom tools on agent.customtooluse. Use when asked to add Arcjet to Claude Managed Agents, rate limit custom tools, or…

arcjet/arcjet-js · 102 tokens

linear-claude-skill

Manage Linear issues, projects, and teams.

Agent-Threat-Rule/agent-threat-rules · 15 tokens

varlock-claude-skill

Secure environment variable management ensuring secrets are never exposed in Claude sessions, terminals, logs, or git commits.

Agent-Threat-Rule/agent-threat-rules · 28 tokens