Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills --skill auditing-presigned-url-scope-abusegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UnboundCompute/security-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-presigned-url-scope-abuse)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-presigned-url-scope-abuse"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-presigned-url-scope-abuse/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-presigned-url-scope-abuse"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-presigned-url-scope-abuse.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00173 | $0.01979 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00086 | $0.00989 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
auditing-presigned-url-scope-abuse scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auditing presigned URL scope abuse: when the signature grants more than the request
A presigned URL turns a server-side permission into a standalone credential: once minted, it grants whatever the signature covers to anyone holding the URL, with no further authorization check at the store. That is convenient and precisely why it leaks. If the service signs a key the caller supplied without confirming the caller owns it, the URL reads or writes another user's object. If the signed policy leaves the key prefix, the HTTP method, the content type, or the expiry looser than the request needed, the holder does more than intended: reads a sibling object, overwrites a path they were only meant to read, or replays the URL long after it should have died. The signer's own identity matters too, because the URL inherits its permissions, not the caller's. You audit these by comparing the signed scope against the caller's actual entitlement.
When to use
- A service mints presigned object-storage URLs so clients read or write a store directly.
- The object key, prefix, bucket, or upload parameters in a presign request come from the caller.
- Presigned URLs are returned to browsers or third parties where they can be inspected, edited, or replayed.
Scope check
Test presigned-URL handling only against storage and applications you own or are authorized to assess, on non-production data. A confirming request reads or writes real objects, so stay inside the authorized bucket and account and never touch another tenant's data outside an owned test fixture. If you can't name the authorization, stop.
The loop
- Establish the caller's real entitlement first. Before inspecting any signature, determine what object or prefix this authenticated caller is actually allowed to read or write. This is the false-positive killer: a presigned URL scoped exactly to what the caller owns is correct no matter how powerful presigning looks. Name the entitlement, then compare the signed scope to it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 135 lines · 173 tokens per session scan A c41e3ab3b292
auditing-presigned-url-scope-abuse is a skill published in the GitHub repository UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 173 tokens to every session and 1,979 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
prodcheck-review
Review this codebase against the prodcheck pre-production checklists — security, performance, scale, integrations and post-launch readiness. Use when asked to check whether a project is ready to ship, to audit an area before launch, or to work through a specific checklist. Produces evidence with file:line citations…
integrate-arcjet-guard-genkit
Integrate Arcjet security into a Genkit JS agent using @arcjet/guard — wrap ai.defineTool, put guardMiddleware on generate({ use }) for unwrapped / MCP / filesystem tools, and read a caller-owned id from generate({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to genkit, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or…
integrate-arcjet-guard-langgraph
Integrate Arcjet security into a LangGraph Graph API agent using @arcjet/guard — wrap tool() / StructuredTool, wrap ToolNode for unwrapped MCP tools, and read threadid for correlation. Use when asked to add Arcjet to a LangGraph StateGraph / ToolNode agent, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or block…
integrate-arcjet-guard-tanstack-ai
Integrate Arcjet security into a TanStack AI chat() app using @arcjet/guard — put guardMiddleware first on chat({ middleware }) so onBeforeToolCall gates tools, and read a caller-owned id from chat({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to TanStack AI, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or block prompt…
integrate-arcjet-guard-claude-managed-agents
Integrate Arcjet security into Claude Managed Agents (hosted REST+SSE, beta managed-agents-2026-04-01) using @arcjet/guard — screen user.message / initialevents before sessions.events.send, and gate custom tools on agent.customtooluse. Use when asked to add Arcjet to Claude Managed Agents, rate limit custom tools, or…
linear-claude-skill
Manage Linear issues, projects, and teams.