Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills --skill auditing-smart-contract-access-controlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UnboundCompute/security-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-smart-contract-access-control)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-smart-contract-access-control"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-smart-contract-access-control/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-smart-contract-access-control"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/auditing-smart-contract-access-control.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00180 | $0.01961 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00090 | $0.00981 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00392 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
auditing-smart-contract-access-control scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auditing smart-contract access control: who is allowed to call the privileged function
Access control on a contract is a set of gates: a modifier or a check that says only the owner, only a role, only during initialization. The bug is a privileged action, moving funds, changing configuration, upgrading, self-destructing, whose gate is missing, wrong, or reachable by the wrong caller. This is a crowded audit area, so the discipline is confirming the action is genuinely privileged and the gate is genuinely absent or defeated on a reachable path, not flagging every public function. The dividing line from reentrancy: if the fix is to add or repair an authorization check, it belongs here; if the fix is to reorder effects before interactions or add a mutex, it belongs in the reentrancy skill. Two initialization and delegation shapes, the unprotected initializer and the delegatecall to an attacker-controlled target, are access-control bugs and are audited here.
When to use
- A function changes state, moves funds, upgrades, self-destructs, or grants a role.
- You see an authorization modifier, an ownership or role check, an initializer, or a delegatecall.
- You want to know whether an attacker can reach a privileged action the contract meant to restrict.
Scope check
Audit only contracts you own or are authorized to assess, and exercise a privileged path only on a test network or a local fork, calling an unguarded privileged function on a live contract can seize or destroy real value. Prove it on a fork. If you can't name the authorization, stop.
The loop
- Inventory the privileged actions and their gates first. List every function that moves funds, changes configuration, upgrades, self-destructs, or grants a role, and for each find the gate that is meant to restrict it (an owner or role modifier, an internal check). A function is only a finding if it is genuinely privileged and its gate is absent, wrong, or reachable by the wrong caller; establish both before flagging.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 130 lines · 180 tokens per session scan A 4de42a177b14
auditing-smart-contract-access-control is a skill published in the GitHub repository UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 180 tokens to every session and 1,961 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
prodcheck-review
Review this codebase against the prodcheck pre-production checklists — security, performance, scale, integrations and post-launch readiness. Use when asked to check whether a project is ready to ship, to audit an area before launch, or to work through a specific checklist. Produces evidence with file:line citations…
web3-audit
Smart contract security audit — 10 DeFi bug classes (accounting desync, access control, incomplete path, off-by-one, oracle, ERC4626, reentrancy, flash loan, signature replay, proxy), pre-dive kill signals (TVL < $500K etc), Foundry PoC template, grep patterns for each class, and real Immunefi paid examples. Use for…
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
integrate-arcjet-guard-genkit
Integrate Arcjet security into a Genkit JS agent using @arcjet/guard — wrap ai.defineTool, put guardMiddleware on generate({ use }) for unwrapped / MCP / filesystem tools, and read a caller-owned id from generate({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to genkit, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or…
integrate-arcjet-guard-tanstack-ai
Integrate Arcjet security into a TanStack AI chat() app using @arcjet/guard — put guardMiddleware first on chat({ middleware }) so onBeforeToolCall gates tools, and read a caller-owned id from chat({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to TanStack AI, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or block prompt…
integrate-arcjet-guard-claude-managed-agents
Integrate Arcjet security into Claude Managed Agents (hosted REST+SSE, beta managed-agents-2026-04-01) using @arcjet/guard — screen user.message / initialevents before sessions.events.send, and gate custom tools on agent.customtooluse. Use when asked to add Arcjet to Claude Managed Agents, rate limit custom tools, or…