Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills --skill hunting-dynamic-linker-hijacksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UnboundCompute/security-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-dynamic-linker-hijacks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-dynamic-linker-hijacks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-dynamic-linker-hijacks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-dynamic-linker-hijacks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-dynamic-linker-hijacks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00164 | $0.02036 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00066 | $0.00814 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00407 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
hunting-dynamic-linker-hijacks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hunting dynamic-linker hijacks: the binary is fine, its search path is not
A trusted program can be perfectly written and still run your code, because it does not choose most of the code it executes: the dynamic loader does, resolving library dependencies at startup and on demand from a search path and a set of environment variables. If any input to that resolution crosses a privilege boundary under attacker influence - a preload variable the privileged process still honors, a writable directory on its search path, a run-path relative to a location you can write - the loader maps your library into the privileged process and runs your initializer as its identity. You find it by asking, for each privileged binary, where the loader looks for code and which of those places an attacker can control.
When to use
- You are auditing a privileged binary, service, container image, or package for local escalation.
- Programs run as a more privileged identity and load libraries dynamically.
- The launch environment, library search path, or embedded run-path may be attacker-influenced.
Scope check
Audit loader-based escalation only on hosts, images, or binaries you own or are authorized to test, with an unprivileged account you may escalate from. If you can't name the authorization, stop.
The loop
-
Identify the privileged binaries and how they launch. Inventory the programs that run as a more privileged identity - services, setuid binaries, jobs - and determine the environment each starts with: what a service manager passes, what a delegation rule preserves or clears, what a parent process hands down. The launch environment decides whether the loader's attacker-facing controls are live across the boundary.
-
Check whether preload variables survive the boundary. The loader ignores preload and library-path variables for a setuid binary launched directly, but a service manager, a delegation rule that preserves the environment, or a wrapper script can carry them across. Determine, per launch path, whether an attacker-set preload or library-path variable reaches the privileged process. Where it does, any preloaded library runs as the privileged identity.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 164 tokens per session scan A 069e26df8090
hunting-dynamic-linker-hijacks is a skill published in the GitHub repository UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 164 tokens to every session and 2,036 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
prodcheck-review
Review this codebase against the prodcheck pre-production checklists — security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch readiness and people. Use when asked to check whether a project is ready to ship, to audit an area before launch, or to work through a specific checklist. Produces evidence with file:line…
integrate-arcjet-guard-genkit
Integrate Arcjet security into a Genkit JS agent using @arcjet/guard — wrap ai.defineTool, put guardMiddleware on generate({ use }) for unwrapped / MCP / filesystem tools, and read a caller-owned id from generate({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to genkit, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or…
integrate-arcjet-guard-tanstack-ai
Integrate Arcjet security into a TanStack AI chat() app using @arcjet/guard — put guardMiddleware first on chat({ middleware }) so onBeforeToolCall gates tools, and read a caller-owned id from chat({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to TanStack AI, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or block prompt…
integrate-arcjet-guard-claude-managed-agents
Integrate Arcjet security into Claude Managed Agents (hosted REST+SSE, beta managed-agents-2026-04-01) using @arcjet/guard — screen user.message / initialevents before sessions.events.send, and gate custom tools on agent.customtooluse. Use when asked to add Arcjet to Claude Managed Agents, rate limit custom tools, or…
linear-claude-skill
Manage Linear issues, projects, and teams.
varlock-claude-skill
Secure environment variable management ensuring secrets are never exposed in Claude sessions, terminals, logs, or git commits.