Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills --skill hunting-host-header-and-url-parsing-trustgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UnboundCompute/security-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-host-header-and-url-parsing-trust)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-host-header-and-url-parsing-trust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-host-header-and-url-parsing-trust/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-host-header-and-url-parsing-trust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-host-header-and-url-parsing-trust.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00173 | $0.02300 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00069 | $0.00920 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00460 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00230 |
Grade A, and why
hunting-host-header-and-url-parsing-trust scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hunting host header and URL parsing trust: when the app believes the request about its own name
An application often needs to know its own address, to put a link in an email or to decide where a request belongs. The easy way is to read it from the incoming request: the Host header, or a forwarded-host header a proxy added. But those are attacker-controlled, and a server that builds a password-reset link from the Host sends the victim a link pointing at the attacker's domain. A shared cache that keys on a header the origin reflects serves the poisoned response to everyone. A router that trusts a forwarded host reaches an internal virtual host. The related trap is URL parsing: when the component that checks a URL and the component that uses it disagree about where the host ends, an allowlist passes a URL that resolves somewhere else. The bug is trusting the request's account of the host, or one parser's reading of a URL, as if it were authoritative. You find it by tracing where self-URLs, cache keys, routes, and allowlists get their host.
When to use
- The app builds absolute URLs (reset, verification, invite links) from the request's Host or forwarded host.
- A shared cache or a router keys on, or routes by, the Host or a forwarded-host header.
- A redirect or fetch allowlist parses a URL, and different components may parse that URL differently.
Scope check
Test host and URL-parsing trust only against systems you own or are authorized to assess, on non-production infrastructure, using a benign host you control and benign markers rather than poisoning a live cache or sending real reset links to third parties. A confirmed cache-poisoning or reset-link case reaches other users, so keep every probe in scope and prefer an isolated instance. If you can't name the authorization, stop.
The loop
- Establish where the host actually comes from first. For each place the app names itself, keys a cache, routes, or matches an allowlist, determine whether it uses a fixed configured base URL and a trusted parser, or derives the host from the incoming Host or forwarded header and parses the URL ad hoc. This is the false-positive killer: a service that builds links from a configured base and routes on a trusted value cannot be poisoned through the header, while one that reflects the request host can. Name the source of the host before crafting a request.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 143 lines · 173 tokens per session scan A b46af7f9063c
hunting-host-header-and-url-parsing-trust is a skill published in the GitHub repository UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 173 tokens to every session and 2,300 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
prodcheck-review
Review this codebase against the prodcheck pre-production checklists — security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch readiness and people. Use when asked to check whether a project is ready to ship, to audit an area before launch, or to work through a specific checklist. Produces evidence with file:line…
integrate-arcjet-guard-genkit
Integrate Arcjet security into a Genkit JS agent using @arcjet/guard — wrap ai.defineTool, put guardMiddleware on generate({ use }) for unwrapped / MCP / filesystem tools, and read a caller-owned id from generate({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to genkit, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or…
integrate-arcjet-guard-tanstack-ai
Integrate Arcjet security into a TanStack AI chat() app using @arcjet/guard — put guardMiddleware first on chat({ middleware }) so onBeforeToolCall gates tools, and read a caller-owned id from chat({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to TanStack AI, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or block prompt…
integrate-arcjet-guard-claude-managed-agents
Integrate Arcjet security into Claude Managed Agents (hosted REST+SSE, beta managed-agents-2026-04-01) using @arcjet/guard — screen user.message / initialevents before sessions.events.send, and gate custom tools on agent.customtooluse. Use when asked to add Arcjet to Claude Managed Agents, rate limit custom tools, or…
linear-claude-skill
Manage Linear issues, projects, and teams.
varlock-claude-skill
Secure environment variable management ensuring secrets are never exposed in Claude sessions, terminals, logs, or git commits.