Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills --skill hunting-redos-and-complexity-dosgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UnboundCompute/security-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-redos-and-complexity-dos)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-redos-and-complexity-dos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-redos-and-complexity-dos/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-redos-and-complexity-dos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-redos-and-complexity-dos.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00167 | $0.02021 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00067 | $0.00808 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00404 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
hunting-redos-and-complexity-dos scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hunting ReDoS and algorithmic-complexity denial of service: when one request burns the CPU
Most denial of service is discussed as flooding: many requests exhausting a pool. The quieter and more dangerous kind is a single small request that pins a CPU core for seconds or minutes, because somewhere the work grows faster than the input. A regular expression with an ambiguous quantifier, a loop that is accidentally quadratic, a parser with no depth limit, or a hash table fed attacker-chosen keys all turn a few kilobytes of input into a stall that a timeout may not even interrupt. You find these by tracing untrusted input to any operation whose cost is super-linear and asking whether anything bounds the work before it runs.
When to use
- Untrusted input reaches a regular expression, a parser, a sort or dedup, or a hash-keyed structure.
- A single small request could pin a CPU core or stall the event loop, not just exhaust connections.
- Input size, nesting depth, or total work is not bounded before the expensive operation runs.
Scope check
Drive worst-case input only against systems you own or are authorized to test, and coordinate: a confirmed complexity bug can take a shared service offline. Measure on a target and load where a stall is acceptable. If you can't name the authorization, stop.
The loop
-
Map untrusted input to expensive operations. Inventory where request-controlled strings, collections, or numbers reach a regular expression, a recursive or backtracking parser, a nested loop over input, a sort or dedup, or a hash-keyed collection. These are the operations whose cost can grow faster than linearly in the size of the input, so these are where a small request buys disproportionate work.
-
Find the super-linear regular expressions. Read each expression that touches untrusted input for the backtracking shapes: a quantified group inside another quantifier such as
(a+)+, overlapping alternation under a quantifier such as(a|a)*, and a quantified class followed by a character the class can also match. On an input that almost matches and then fails at the end, the engine explores exponentially or polynomially many paths. A crafted string of a few kilobytes can run for seconds.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 167 tokens per session scan A a0de042f1c88
hunting-redos-and-complexity-dos is a skill published in the GitHub repository UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 167 tokens to every session and 2,021 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
prodcheck-review
Review this codebase against the prodcheck pre-production checklists — security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch readiness and people. Use when asked to check whether a project is ready to ship, to audit an area before launch, or to work through a specific checklist. Produces evidence with file:line…
integrate-arcjet-guard-genkit
Integrate Arcjet security into a Genkit JS agent using @arcjet/guard — wrap ai.defineTool, put guardMiddleware on generate({ use }) for unwrapped / MCP / filesystem tools, and read a caller-owned id from generate({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to genkit, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or…
integrate-arcjet-guard-tanstack-ai
Integrate Arcjet security into a TanStack AI chat() app using @arcjet/guard — put guardMiddleware first on chat({ middleware }) so onBeforeToolCall gates tools, and read a caller-owned id from chat({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to TanStack AI, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or block prompt…
integrate-arcjet-guard-claude-managed-agents
Integrate Arcjet security into Claude Managed Agents (hosted REST+SSE, beta managed-agents-2026-04-01) using @arcjet/guard — screen user.message / initialevents before sessions.events.send, and gate custom tools on agent.customtooluse. Use when asked to add Arcjet to Claude Managed Agents, rate limit custom tools, or…
linear-claude-skill
Manage Linear issues, projects, and teams.
varlock-claude-skill
Secure environment variable management ensuring secrets are never exposed in Claude sessions, terminals, logs, or git commits.