hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation

hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation is a skill for Claude Code from UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills. It costs 174 tokens per session (2,136 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A security review guide for finding Windows service privilege escalation, where a standard user can influence what a service runs as a higher-privileged account.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect Windows services and check whether non-admin users can change their executable, path, registry settings, or related directories.
Why use it?
It exposes writable service files, paths, permissions, or configuration that could make the service execute attacker-controlled code.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the security-agent-skills plugin — 194 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to inspect Windows services and check whether non-admin users can change their executable, path, registry settings, or related directories.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills --skill hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install security-agent-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 194 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unboundcompute/security-agent-skills/hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 174 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,136 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00174 $0.02136
Opus 5.5 $0.00070 $0.00854
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00035 $0.00427
Haiku 4.5 $0.00017 $0.00214

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ca0d76e76d67, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation/SKILL.md · 142 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Hunting Windows service privilege escalation: when a standard user decides what SYSTEM runs

A Windows service usually runs as a high-privileged account, often the local system account, and the service manager starts whatever binary the service configuration names. That is safe only if a low-privileged user cannot influence which binary runs or where it is found. When they can, the service becomes an escalation: the user changes the configured binary because the service object grants them that right, or replaces the binary because its file or directory is writable, or plants a file earlier on an unquoted path because an intervening directory is writable, or rewrites the service's registry configuration because its key is weakly permissioned. At the next start, the privileged account runs the attacker's code. The bug is not the service running as system; it is a standard user holding a write that reaches what system executes. You find these by listing services and asking, for each, whether a non-admin can change the binary, the path, or the config.

When to use

  • A Windows host runs services as a privileged account and you can enumerate their config and permissions.
  • Service binaries, their directories, or unquoted service paths may be writable by a standard user.
  • Service objects or their registry keys may grant configuration rights to non-administrators.

Scope check

Test service escalation only on hosts you own or are authorized to assess, on non-production or a snapshot, using a benign marker payload that proves execution as the privileged account rather than taking real action with it. A confirmed path yields code execution as a system account, so keep every probe within the authorized scope. If you can't name the authorization, stop.

The loop

  1. Establish the service's account and who can influence its target first. For each service, determine the account it runs as and whether a standard user holds any write that reaches what it executes: a service-object right to reconfigure it, write access to the binary or its directory, a writable directory earlier on an unquoted path, or write access to the service's registry key. This is the false-positive killer: a service whose binary, path, and configuration are writable only by administrators cannot be redirected by a standard user, however privileged the account it runs as. Name the specific write before claiming a path.

Read the full file on GitHub · 142 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 142 lines · 174 tokens per session scan A ca0d76e76d67

Subscribe to this mod's changes

hunting-windows-service-privilege-escalation is a skill published in the GitHub repository UnboundCompute/security-agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 174 tokens to every session and 2,136 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-09.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

prodcheck-review

Review this codebase against the prodcheck pre-production checklists — security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch readiness and people. Use when asked to check whether a project is ready to ship, to audit an area before launch, or to work through a specific checklist. Produces evidence with file:line…

FarzamHabibi/pre-production-checklist · 72 tokens

integrate-arcjet-guard-genkit

Integrate Arcjet security into a Genkit JS agent using @arcjet/guard — wrap ai.defineTool, put guardMiddleware on generate({ use }) for unwrapped / MCP / filesystem tools, and read a caller-owned id from generate({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to genkit, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or…

arcjet/arcjet-js · 89 tokens

integrate-arcjet-guard-tanstack-ai

Integrate Arcjet security into a TanStack AI chat() app using @arcjet/guard — put guardMiddleware first on chat({ middleware }) so onBeforeToolCall gates tools, and read a caller-owned id from chat({ context }). Use when asked to add Arcjet to TanStack AI, rate limit its tools, screen inbound messages, or block prompt…

arcjet/arcjet-js · 103 tokens

integrate-arcjet-guard-claude-managed-agents

Integrate Arcjet security into Claude Managed Agents (hosted REST+SSE, beta managed-agents-2026-04-01) using @arcjet/guard — screen user.message / initialevents before sessions.events.send, and gate custom tools on agent.customtooluse. Use when asked to add Arcjet to Claude Managed Agents, rate limit custom tools, or…

arcjet/arcjet-js · 102 tokens

linear-claude-skill

Manage Linear issues, projects, and teams.

Agent-Threat-Rule/agent-threat-rules · 15 tokens

varlock-claude-skill

Secure environment variable management ensuring secrets are never exposed in Claude sessions, terminals, logs, or git commits.

Agent-Threat-Rule/agent-threat-rules · 28 tokens