Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/unclecatvn/agent-skills/code-reviewnpx skills add unclecatvn/agent-skills --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unclecatvn/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unclecatvn/agent-skills/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unclecatvn/agent-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unclecatvn/agent-skills/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00086 | $0.01105 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to code-review — 19 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review
Guide proper code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification over performative responses.
Overview
Code review requires three distinct practices:
- Receiving feedback - Technical evaluation over performative agreement
- Requesting reviews - Systematic review via code-reviewer subagent
- Verification gates - Evidence before any completion claims
Each practice has specific triggers and protocols detailed in reference files.
Core Principle
Technical correctness over social comfort. Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Evidence before claims.
When to Use This Skill
Receiving Feedback
Trigger when:
- Receiving code review comments from any source
- Feedback seems unclear or technically questionable
- Multiple review items need prioritization
- External reviewer lacks full context
- Suggestion conflicts with existing decisions
Reference: references/code-review-reception.md
Requesting Review
Trigger when:
- Completing tasks in subagent-driven development (after EACH task)
- Finishing major features or refactors
- Before merging to main branch
- Stuck and need fresh perspective
- After fixing complex bugs
Reference: references/requesting-code-review.md
Verification Gates
Trigger when:
- About to claim tests pass, build succeeds, or work is complete
- Before committing, pushing, or creating PRs
- Moving to next task
- Any statement suggesting success/completion
- Expressing satisfaction with work
Reference: references/verification-before-completion.md
Quick Decision Tree
SITUATION?
│
├─ Received feedback
│ ├─ Unclear items? → STOP, ask for clarification first
│ ├─ From human partner? → Understand, then implement
│ └─ From external reviewer? → Verify technically before implementing
│
├─ Completed work
│ ├─ Major feature/task? → Request code-reviewer subagent review
│ └─ Before merge? → Request code-reviewer subagent review
│
└─ About to claim status
├─ Have fresh verification? → State claim WITH evidence
└─ No fresh verification? → RUN verification command first
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 141 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A d7ae241ea6db
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository unclecatvn/agent-skills (130 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 1,105 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to code-review, differing in 19 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
new-odoo-project
TRIGGER: User invokes /new-odoo-project to scaffold a new Odoo website builder project.
odoo-theme-fix
TRIGGER: User shares a screenshot of an Odoo page and asks for visual fixes, theming improvements, or readability changes.
erp-integration
Sync orders, inventory, and customer data between your store and ERP systems like SAP, NetSuite, or Odoo using middleware and async queues.
erpipe-odoo-mcp
Use whenever calling ERPipe or Odoo MCP tools (user-erpipe, GetMcpTools, listinstances, modelfacts, searchrecords, previewwrite, executemethod, executeapprovedwrite, recallmemory, rememberepisode, forgetmemory). Token-efficient tool discovery and the golden Odoo loop. Apply in any repo that uses the ERPipe MCP server.
odoo-integration
Use this skill when the user needs to connect to Odoo via XML-RPC, sync Odoo data to external systems (Google Sheets, databases, APIs), read or write Odoo models (stock.picking, sale.order, purchase.order, product.product, etc.), set up cron-based sync jobs, or deploy Odoo integrations on Railway/Render/Fly.io. Also…
Creazione di Editor GUI per Viste XML Odoo
Crea un'applicazione Python con Tkinter per visualizzare, modificare e gestire file XML di viste Odoo. Include parsing ricorsivo, gestione gerarchica degli elementi, modifica di attributi, validazione e gestione delle eccezioni.