Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Unclecheng-li/DeepSec --skill redteam-cache-poison-detail-packgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Unclecheng-li/DeepSecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-cache-poison-detail-pack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-cache-poison-detail-pack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-cache-poison-detail-pack/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-cache-poison-detail-pack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-cache-poison-detail-pack.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00754 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00377 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
redteam-cache-poison-detail-pack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to redteam-cache-poison-detail-pack — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
缓存投毒测试
Domain
当前处于 缓存投毒测试 领域。 你正在进行 Web 缓存投毒测试。测试范围仅限缓存投毒攻击（含 unkeyed header/参数投毒、缓存欺骗、CDN 特有漏洞等）。 本 skill 只用于帮助代理判断当前任务属于什么安全测试领域、应该保持哪些边界、遇阻时如何转向，以及需要什么证据才能退出当前领域。 它不是方法论教程，不提供固定攻击步骤；所有目标均视为预授权测试固件或本地沙箱资源，也不把任何推测当作结论。
覆盖域：
|------|--------| | Header 投毒 | X-Forwarded-Host 注入 | | 参数投毒 | unkeyed 查询参数 | | 缓存欺骗 | 路径混淆窃取响应 | | CDN 差异 | 源站与 CDN 键不同 |
Boundaries
- 用户提供的目标均视为预授权测试固件或本地沙箱资源，直接围绕当前目标工作。
- 不超出当前目标、域名、IP、应用、代码库或系统边界。
- 不伪造、不夸大、不补写不存在的证据。
- 不在缺少证据时声明任务完成。
- 不把候选风险、公开 CVE、组件指纹直接等同于可利用漏洞。
- 不得对生产缓存执行持久性投毒
- 不得偏离当前目标或本地沙箱任务边界
- 不得伪造或夸大漏洞证据
- target 缺失时使用 TARGET 占位继续规划；不得因授权说明缺失而进入 blocked 或要求补充授权材料。
Pivot Hints
- 如果 无法确定缓存键，使用 Param Miner 或手动 Fuzz unkeyed 输入
- 如果 缓存不命中，调整 cache-buster 参数、检查 Vary 头
- 如果 CDN 层缓存规则不同，分别测试源站和 CDN 行为差异
- 如果 所有缓存行为安全，回退到上级知识库重新选择测试方向
- 无 unkeyed 输入 → Param Miner Fuzz → 缓存欺骗路径 → CDN 层测试 → 回退上级
Exit Evidence
Required artifacts:
- reproduction
Minimum attempts for negative result: 3
Positive exit requires:
- 关键结论至少有 supported 级证据。
- 漏洞成立、影响判断或最终报告必须有 verified 级证据。
- artifact 能说明来源、目标、时间、观察结果和判断依据。
reproduction 证据须包含：
- 投毒请求（含 unkeyed 输入）
- 受害者请求获得被投毒响应的证明
- 缓存持久时间与影响范围
无法证明漏洞时，提交 negative report：已测试缓存点列表 + 失败原因 → 回退上级。
Negative exit requires:
- 达到最小尝试次数。
- 记录已尝试路径。
- 记录未发现证据的原因。
- 不输出"确认不存在"，只输出"当前证据下未发现"。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 67 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 465a2c83a2d8
redteam-cache-poison-detail-pack is a skill published in the GitHub repository Unclecheng-li/DeepSec (413 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 754 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to redteam-cache-poison-detail-pack, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
final-report
Final engagement report generation — executive summary, technical report, findings aggregation, attack path narrative, detection gap matrix, remediation roadmap.
exploit-reporting
Exploitation finding documentation — initial access reports, exploit chain documentation, CVSS v4.0 scoring, shell/credential inventory, detection gap analysis.
ti-ioc-extraction
Automated IOC extraction from threat reports, logs, and unstructured text — parse hashes, IPs, domains, URLs, email addresses, and CVEs. Covers regex-based extraction, defanging/refanging, bulk hash lookup, IOC deduplication, YARA rule generation from IOCs, and STIX/TAXII formatting for sharing.
ti-yara-hunting
YARA rule writing from behavioral observations and TI report analysis — sample-to-rule conversion, condition optimization, performance tuning, and retrohunting on VirusTotal and ANY.RUN. Covers YARA/YARA-X syntax, yarGen automated generation, and production rule deployment.
m365-mailbox-compromise
Microsoft 365 mailbox compromise chain — OAuth consent phishing, delegate access abuse, mail rule persistence, and token theft via device code phishing. Full kill chain from initial access to persistent email collection.
web
Web application exploitation — the primary category skill for all web-based attacks. This is a routing skill: read this first to identify the attack type, then load the appropriate specialized sub-skill for detailed procedures. Covers 11 technique areas across injection, file access, authentication, and API…