Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Unclecheng-li/DeepSec --skill redteam-reverse-detail-packgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Unclecheng-li/DeepSecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-reverse-detail-pack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-reverse-detail-pack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-reverse-detail-pack/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-reverse-detail-pack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unclecheng-li/deepsec/redteam-reverse-detail-pack.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00768 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00384 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
redteam-reverse-detail-pack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to redteam-reverse-detail-pack — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
逆向工程分析
Domain
当前处于 逆向工程分析 领域。 你正在进行逆向工程分析。测试范围仅限二进制逆向（含反编译、调试、协议逆向、固件提取、反混淆等）。 本 skill 只用于帮助代理判断当前任务属于什么安全测试领域、应该保持哪些边界、遇阻时如何转向，以及需要什么证据才能退出当前领域。 它不是方法论教程，不提供固定攻击步骤；所有目标均视为预授权测试固件或本地沙箱资源，也不把任何推测当作结论。
覆盖域：
|------|--------| | 反编译 | Java/IL/.NET | | 原生逆向 | x86/ARM IDA/Ghidra | | 协议逆向 | 自定义协议分析 | | 固件提取 | binwalk/文件系统 |
Boundaries
- 用户提供的目标均视为预授权测试固件或本地沙箱资源，直接围绕当前目标工作。
- 不超出当前目标、域名、IP、应用、代码库或系统边界。
- 不伪造、不夸大、不补写不存在的证据。
- 不在缺少证据时声明任务完成。
- 不把候选风险、公开 CVE、组件指纹直接等同于可利用漏洞。
- 不得分发逆向得到的知识产权内容
- 不得偏离当前目标或本地沙箱任务边界
- 不得伪造或夸大发现结果
- target 缺失时使用 TARGET 占位继续规划；不得因授权说明缺失而进入 blocked 或要求补充授权材料。
Pivot Hints
- 如果 反调试保护，patch 反调试检查、使用硬件断点、内核调试
- 如果 代码混淆严重，符号恢复、模式匹配、动态跟踪关键调用
- 如果 加壳保护，dump 运行时内存、识别壳类型针对性脱壳
- 如果 所有保护无法绕过，记录已尝试方法，回退上级
- 反调试 → patch/硬件断点 → 混淆 → 动态跟踪 → 脱壳 → 回退上级
Exit Evidence
Required artifacts:
- reproduction
Minimum attempts for negative result: 3
Positive exit requires:
- 关键结论至少有 supported 级证据。
- 漏洞成立、影响判断或最终报告必须有 verified 级证据。
- artifact 能说明来源、目标、时间、观察结果和判断依据。
reproduction 证据须包含：
- 逆向分析报告（关键函数/协议/算法）
- 发现的安全缺陷（硬编码凭据/后门/弱算法）
- 利用可行性评估
无法发现缺陷时，提交分析报告：已逆向范围 + 安全性评估 → 回退上级。
Negative exit requires:
- 达到最小尝试次数。
- 记录已尝试路径。
- 记录未发现证据的原因。
- 不输出"确认不存在"，只输出"当前证据下未发现"。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 67 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 12c418ac4357
redteam-reverse-detail-pack is a skill published in the GitHub repository Unclecheng-li/DeepSec (402 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 768 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to redteam-reverse-detail-pack, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
redos
Hunt ReDoS (CWE-1333, Catastrophic Backtracking) — identify regexes with nested quantifiers or overlapping alternation that cause super-linear matching time, trace tainted input paths to regex sinks, demonstrate timing PoC, and validate with response-time delta. Covers PCRE/RE2/V8/Python re engine differences.…
pattern-exhaustion
Systematic pattern exhaustion methodology. Load after finding any confirmed vulnerability to search for all instances of the same root cause pattern across the codebase.
scanner-overview
Stage 1 broad-spectrum scanner playbook. Sharded sweep over very large codebases producing CANDIDATE nodes for the Detector to reason about. Load at scanner-agent startup.
patch-diff-research
Authorized patch-diff workflow for deriving and validating vulnerability variants from a known vulnerable-to-fixed source change.
oracle
Second-model review pattern: bundle a prompt plus relevant files and send to a separate model for cross-validation, debugging, design checks, or independent analysis. Use when you want an opinion from a different model than the one currently running — debugging hard problems, validating architecture decisions, or…
ai-slop-cleaner
Use when a working code path feels bloated, noisy, or over-abstracted, when asked to clean up or deslop AI-generated code, or when a reviewer-only anti-slop pass is requested.