Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/understudylabs/understudy-agent-tools/operate-benchmark-labnpx skills add understudylabs/understudy-agent-tools --skill operate-benchmark-labgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/understudylabs/understudy-agent-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/understudylabs/understudy-agent-tools/operate-benchmark-lab)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/understudylabs/understudy-agent-tools/operate-benchmark-lab"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/understudylabs/understudy-agent-tools/operate-benchmark-lab.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00109 | $0.03740 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.01870 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00748 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00374 |
Grade A, and why
operate-benchmark-lab scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 257 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Operate the benchmark lab
The operator's manual for the whole benchmark/experiment lifecycle a coding
agent can drive end to end. Two interfaces over the same sidecar files:
the benchmarks MCP server (preferred for agents — same validation code as
the hub API) and the CLI verbs. Execution always happens in a separate
executor process; the MCP server and hub never run models. Command matrix,
artifact map, and daemon details in reference.md; the tool
table and agent loop in docs/agent-operator-surface.md.
Resolve CLI
Prefer the installed understudy binary. If it is unavailable inside a repo
checkout, run through the package script:
npm run build
node dist/bin.js benchmarks mcp --root <dir>
MCP registration (Claude Code ~/.claude.json → mcpServers):
{ "understudy-benchmarks": { "type": "stdio", "command": "understudy", "args": ["benchmarks", "mcp"] } }
— default root ~/.understudy/benchmarks; add --root per extra directory.
Safety Gates
- Queueing is not executing.
queue_run/understudy runs queueonly writes a request file. Model rollouts spend gateway money only when an executor picks the request up; say which executor will, before queueing. - Trust posture, not per-call dialogs. Spend-adjacent shapes (multi-arm
or multi-rollout runs, implicit all-task runs, experiment
approval/verdict patches) consult the one-time posture in
~/.understudy/trust.json(understudy trust set, levelslocal_sandbox<bounded_experiments<hosted_ops). Atbounded_experiments+ they proceed with a visible one-line notice (arm count, rough cost) — surface that notice to the user, then keep moving. Below that, the guard returns the one action to offer (understudy trust set bounded_experiments);confirm: trueafter explicit in-chat consent stays a per-call escape hatch. There is NO default spend cap: the posture'sallow_spend_usd_per_runis an opt-in generous stop-loss (warn at 1x with a recordedspend_warning; hard stop only at 2x withspend_stop). - Local arms are machine-aware. On predicted OOM (onboarding profile /
memory probe) or a serve failure, the executor runs the arm on the gateway
base model and records it —
arm_fallbackevent plusfallback_reasonon every row. Report the fallback; never present a fallen-back arm as a local measurement. - One executor per benchmark dir. Before starting
runs execute --watch, check for a live claim (claimed_byon the request,executor_versionon events) — a stale watcher built before a feature landed is the classic corruption hazard; new requests carryrequires:[...]so old executors skip them withrun_unsupportedinstead of running them bare. - Reviews and feedback are append-only ledgers; never edit
reviews.jsonl/feedback.jsonllines in place. Generated tasks are born accepted (review-policydefault_decision: "accept") —reviews.jsonlcarries explicit overrides only.apply_auto_acceptsmatters only for benchmarks opted intodefault_decision: "pending", and is itself the explicit user action — invoke it only when the developer asked. - Honest reporting only: anomaly rows (
rollout_timeout,app_replay_unobserved, structural sentinels) are excluded from aggregates but reported, never fabricated as scores. Overlapping CIs are a tie. - Verifier-only changes regrade, never rerun. When only the verifier group changed (gold, contract, rubric, metric config — a MINOR bump), re-score the existing trajectories; queueing fresh rollouts for a verifier fix wastes gateway money and destroys comparability. Rerun is reserved for env-group (MAJOR) changes.
- Fixture-test every verifier before trusting it. One known-valid result must pass and one plausible-but-wrong result must fail. A verifier that has never rejected a wrong answer has not been tested; do not regrade or calibrate against it.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 257 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A 804c8553bb45
operate-benchmark-lab is a skill published in the GitHub repository understudylabs/understudy-agent-tools (16 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 3,740 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…