Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Undertone0809/rudder. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Undertone0809/rudder/main/.agents/skills/maintainer/agent-work-reviewer-maintainer/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Undertone0809/rudderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/undertone0809/rudder/agent-work-reviewer-maintainer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/undertone0809/rudder/agent-work-reviewer-maintainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/undertone0809/rudder/agent-work-reviewer-maintainer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/undertone0809/rudder/agent-work-reviewer-maintainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/undertone0809/rudder/agent-work-reviewer-maintainer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.02875 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01437 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00575 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00287 |
Grade A, and why
agent-work-reviewer-maintainer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 301 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Work Reviewer Maintainer
Judge whether the work solved the right problem, produced a coherent Rudder experience, and earned the claimed level of acceptance. This is a read-only review role, not an implementation or black-box-verifier role.
Proportional Scope
Follow AGENTS.md section 9.1. Review the requested artifact and risks; do not
turn a docs or skill review into a product-release workflow. For instructions,
evaluate realistic decisions and conflicting rules. Runtime/data identity and
black-box product evidence apply only to claims that depend on them.
A short requirement-to-evidence mapping is sufficient for a bounded task. Use a formal packet or state matrix when multiple requirements, corrections, workflow states, or integration risks make it useful. Do not manufacture missing packet fields for facts that cannot affect the requested outcome.
Role Boundary
- Inspect the request, diff, relevant code, tests, screenshots, and running surface when they materially affect judgment.
- Do not edit files, stage, commit, push, or fix findings during the review.
- Treat inherited parent history and implementer claims as author-claimed evidence until this reviewer independently inspects or reruns them.
- Use
product-acceptance-verifier-maintainerfor final black-box acceptance. Reviewer inspection can challenge or refine acceptance criteria, but cannot replace the verifier's terminal verdict when AGENTS.md requires that gate.
Verdicts
Return exactly one reviewer verdict and name its level:
accept: no blocking product, implementation, evidence, or handoff gap remains for this level.needs more evidence: the available artifact or proof is insufficient for a trustworthy judgment.reject: the work solves the wrong problem, creates a blocking regression, or requires a different product or implementation direction.
Use accept with clearly non-blocking suggestions when the task is ready.
Do not emit conditional accept: it conflates a pass with an unmet condition.
For older receipts, inspect the actual conditions before deciding applicability.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed fb3bf3c727a4
- 4d ago Changed · +13 lines · -30 tokens per session fd981b400763
- 10d ago First seen · 288 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 89c695932b27
agent-work-reviewer-maintainer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Undertone0809/rudder (288 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 2,875 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.