Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Unibean9/harness-skills --skill hs-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Unibean9/harness-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unibean9/harness-skills/hs-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unibean9/harness-skills/hs-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unibean9/harness-skills/hs-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unibean9/harness-skills/hs-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unibean9/harness-skills/hs-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.01265 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00506 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00253 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
hs-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +68 lines · -8 tokens per session cd25bb731fc6
- 27d ago First seen · 75 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A cdecb93104d4
hs-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Unibean9/harness-skills (18 stars, last pushed 21d ago), with no licence file. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 1,265 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-19.
Other skills, from other repositories
tsq-audit
A code-audit skill that reviews changed files and runs relevant verification checks. It produces a report grouped by severity across security, type safety, error handling, API compatibility, tests, and performance.
PR Standards
Pull request description, review depth, and merge standards so every PR carries enough context to review and merge safely.
fresh-eyes-review
This skill should be used as a mandatory final sanity check before git commit, PR creation, or declaring work done. Triggers on "commit", "push", "PR", "pull request", "done", "finished", "complete", "ship", "deploy", "ready to merge". Catches security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and business rule bugs that slip…
proving-change-safety
Find what a change could break beyond the diff, then prove the one fact it is safe because of by running real code. Apply when the user asks what a change could break, whether a small diff is safe to merge, or to prove a safety fact before shipping. Use subsystem-walkthrough for how it works. Use design-rationale for…
pr-reviewer
AI-powered pull request review and summarization - analyze diffs, detect bugs, security issues, suggest improvements, generate PR summaries, and auto-comment on GitHub PRs.
code-review
A code-review skill that checks code for bugs, performance issues, style problems, and security risks. Code review is the practice of examining code before it is accepted or released.