Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Unique-Divine/jiyuu --skill gh-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Unique-Divine/jiyuuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unique-divine/jiyuu/gh-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unique-divine/jiyuu/gh-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unique-divine/jiyuu/gh-pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01193 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00596 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00239 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
gh-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GH PR
Purpose
Create a clear, logical pull request description for the current branch diff against a base branch. A good PR body explains the problem, the decisions that shape the implementation, and the resulting behavior—not merely the changed files.
Instructions
When using this skill:
- Determine the comparison branch first:
- Use the branch the user specifies when they name one.
- Otherwise, default to
main. - If the correct base branch is unclear, ask the user before drafting the pull request description.
- If the repo clearly uses another default integration branch, such as
dev, use that instead of assumingmain.
- Read any linked issue, epic, journal, design, or acceptance criteria before drafting. Treat agreed decisions and accounting/event semantics in those documents as source material for the body.
- Write a pull request description that explains the rationale behind the changes, not just the file-by-file edits. State what was broken or incomplete, why the chosen boundary or data contract is correct, and which existing semantics intentionally remain unchanged.
- Put reviewer context in this order: the PR title and synopsis,
## Rationale,## Key Changes, then any additional behavior-oriented sections. KeepRationaleandKey Changesunnumbered. Number only the additional topic headings as## 1 - ...,## 2 - ..., and so forth. The numbering improves scanning across distinct topics; it does not imply implementation order or runtime sequence. - For changes with non-obvious behavior, cross-system effects, accounting,
migrations, or several related fixes, use the additional sections to explain
the relevant logic. Name them for the subject—for example
## 1 - Partial-close behavior,## 2 - Borrowing settlement, or## 3 - Historical compatibility—rather than using implementation-oriented headings. - For migrations, accounting changes, data-contract cutovers, or asynchronous authority/fallback behavior, lead the relevant additional section with a compact ASCII flow or field map. Use prose afterward only for the rationale the flow cannot convey. Do not use Mermaid.
- Do not add a dedicated
Validation,Testing, or similarly named section, and do not enumerate routine test, lint, build, formatting, or check runs. Mention test strategy or coverage only when it materially changes or creates a reviewer-relevant risk; place that context in the most relevant behavior-oriented section. - Keep the writing concise and non-repetitive, but do not omit the reasoning that a reviewer needs to validate the design.
- Save the final output to a markdown file named
gh-pr.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 123 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A fd8804af39d7
gh-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository Unique-Divine/jiyuu (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,193 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
vhs-e2e-gif
Record a test run, a TUI session, or any terminal command as a GIF with VHS and attach it to a GitHub PR as a release-hosted asset, never a repo commit. Use when asked to record an e2e run, demo a fix on a PR, attach a GIF or screen recording to a pull request, show a test passing visually, or produce a terminal…
skill-creator
Create, edit, improve, or audit AgentSkills. Use when creating a new skill from scratch or when asked to improve, review, audit, tidy up, or clean up an existing skill or SKILL.md file. Also use when editing or restructuring a skill directory.
code-guidelines-go
Go 1.24–1.27 coding guidelines for the dimetron/pi-go AI agent runtime. Use this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or refactoring ANY Go code in pi-go. This covers idiomatic style, error handling, concurrency, project layout, testing (table-driven, fuzz, benchmarks, synctest), new stdlib usage, golangci-lint v2…
code-reviewer
Analyze project source code and generate optimization suggestions. Use when user wants code review, performance optimization advice, security hardening recommendations, or architecture improvement suggestions.
commit-generate
Generate bilingual (English + Traditional Chinese) commit message from git changes.
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.