Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Unique-Divine/jiyuu --skill unslopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Unique-Divine/jiyuuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unique-divine/jiyuu/unslop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unique-divine/jiyuu/unslop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unique-divine/jiyuu/unslop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unique-divine/jiyuu/unslop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unique-divine/jiyuu/unslop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.01619 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00648 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00324 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
unslop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to unslop — 49 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Unslop
Edit text to remove AI patterns and add human voice.
Process
- Scan for the patterns below.
- Rewrite. Preserve meaning, match intended tone.
- Add soul (see next section).
- Self-audit: "What makes this obviously AI generated?" Fix remaining tells.
Adding soul
Removing patterns is half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is just as obvious.
- Have opinions. React to facts instead of neutrally listing pros and cons.
- Vary rhythm. Short sentences. Then longer ones that take their time. Mix it up.
- Acknowledge complexity. "Impressive but also kind of unsettling" beats "impressive."
- Use "I" when it fits. First person isn't unprofessional.
- Let some mess in. Perfect structure looks machine-made.
- Be specific. Not "this is concerning" but "there's something unsettling about agents churning away at 3am."
Patterns to detect and fix
Content
- Puffery. "pivotal moment", "testament to", "evolving landscape", "setting the stage for", "indelible mark", "deeply rooted". Cut puffery, state what happened.
- Name-dropping. Listing media outlets without context. Pick one, say what was said.
- Superficial -ing phrases. "highlighting...", "ensuring...", "reflecting...", "showcasing...", "fostering...". Delete or expand with real sources.
- Promotional language. "nestled", "vibrant", "breathtaking", "groundbreaking", "renowned", "stunning", "must-visit". Use neutral descriptions.
- Vague attributions. "Experts believe", "Industry reports suggest", "Some critics argue". Name the source or delete.
- Formulaic challenges. "Despite challenges... continues to thrive." Replace with specific facts.
Language
- AI vocabulary. Additionally, crucial, delve, enduring, enhance, fostering, garner, interplay, intricate, landscape (abstract), pivotal, showcase, tapestry (abstract), testament, underscore, vibrant. Replace with plain words.
- Fancy ways to say "is". "serves as", "stands as", "boasts", "features". Just say "is" or "has".
- "Not just X, but Y." State the point directly instead.
- Rule of three. Forcing ideas into groups of three. Use the natural number.
- Synonym cycling. Protagonist, main character, central figure, hero all in one paragraph. Pick one, repeat it.
- False ranges. "from X to Y" where X and Y aren't on a meaningful scale. List topics directly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed · -80 lines 181883e539ca
- 1mo ago First seen · 161 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 9aa59c06cc72
unslop is a skill published in the GitHub repository Unique-Divine/jiyuu (6 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,619 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to unslop, differing in 49 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
use-modern-go
Use the Modern Go Guidelines CLI whenever writing, modifying, fixing, or refactoring Go code. Apply its version-specific guidance to generated changes.
migrate-goldmark-extension-v1-to-v2
Migrate goldmark extension from goldmark v1 to v2.
bubbletea-testing
Use this skill whenever writing tests for Bubble Tea (charmbracelet/bubbletea) TUI applications in Go. Triggers include any mention of testing Bubble Tea models, teatest, golden file testing for TUIs, testing tea.Cmd or tea.Msg, snapshot testing terminal output, or writing tests for any Go CLI/TUI that uses the Elm…
go
Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or shipping Go code and HTTP services: idioms, %w error wrapping, goroutine/context/errgroup concurrency, net/http 1.22 routing, log/slog, project layout, table-driven tests, Go hardening. NOT language-agnostic threat modeling (that is secure-coding), NOT Dockerfile/CI shipping…
gograph
Go repository intelligence for Claude Code. Use when reading, navigating, editing, reviewing, or refactoring a Go codebase. Exposes 64 query, analysis, and workflow capabilities through the local gograph MCP server, including bounded first-call exploration, AST-aware call graphs, blast-radius analysis, impact, and…
pi-loop-forensics
Diagnose pi-go agent loops and degenerate turns — "agent loop aborted", runaway thinking with no tool calls, repeated phrases. Discriminates genuine model repetition collapse from a race, a tool-parse failure, or a too-low guard, and A/B replays a seed session across providers.