Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add unrealandychan/clean-code-skill --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unrealandychan/clean-code-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00679 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review & Quality Skill
Inspired by Addy Osmani's
agent-skills(addyosmani/agent-skills/skills/code-review-and-quality/SKILL.md).
Overview
Performs rigorous, multi-dimensional code reviews across Correctness, Readability, Architecture, Security, and Performance.
When to Invoke This Skill
Use this skill when:
- The user requests a code review, pull request review, or quality check (
/code-review,/review-diff,/review-security,/review-perf). - Reviewing new code or refactoring changes before merging.
- Evaluating code health across the 5 axes of quality.
- Checking merge readiness against automated quality gates (
/quality-gate).
The 5-Axis Quality Framework
- Correctness: Spec/acceptance criteria alignment, edge cases, error handling, race conditions.
- Readability: Clear naming, small functions, self-documenting structure, why-focused comments.
- Architecture: Separation of concerns, bounded context boundaries, Ponytail anti-overengineering ladder.
- Security: OWASP top risks, input sanitization, secret protection, least privilege.
- Performance: Query batching, memory leak prevention, async efficiency, resource bounding.
Review Benchmark
Approve a change when it definitely improves overall code health, even if it isn't perfect. Perfect code doesn't exist — continuous improvement is the goal.
Execution Procedure
- Scope the Diff: Identify changed files, target branch, and relevant tests using
git diffor PR metadata. - Scan Invariants: Verify that business invariants, types, and contract tests pass before aesthetic feedback.
- Evaluate 5 Axes: Assess each axis sequentially; flag blocking bugs immediately.
- Deliver Structured Findings:
- Severity:
BLOCK,WARN,NIT. - Category: One of the 5 axes.
- Evidence: Exact file link and line range.
- Proposed Fix: Minimal, drop-in code snippet.
- Severity:
Quick Shortcuts
| Command | Action |
|---|---|
/code-review |
Full 5-axis code review on target files or git diff |
/review-diff |
Review git diff against HEAD / main branch |
/review-security |
Focused security audit (injection, secrets, OWASP) |
/review-perf |
Focused performance & memory leak audit |
/quality-gate |
Evaluate whether code passes merge readiness criteria |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines · +69 tokens per session a2e292357977
- 1mo ago First seen · 55 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2d69661757a0
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository unrealandychan/clean-code-skill (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 679 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…