Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unrealandychan/clean-code-skillnpx agentmods add skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/e2e-testingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/e2e-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/e2e-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/e2e-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/e2e-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/e2e-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.02122 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00849 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00424 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
e2e-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to e2e-testing — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 328 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
E2E Testing Patterns
Comprehensive Playwright patterns for building stable, fast, and maintainable E2E test suites.
Test File Organization
tests/
├── e2e/
│ ├── auth/
│ │ ├── login.spec.ts
│ │ ├── logout.spec.ts
│ │ └── register.spec.ts
│ ├── features/
│ │ ├── browse.spec.ts
│ │ ├── search.spec.ts
│ │ └── create.spec.ts
│ └── api/
│ └── endpoints.spec.ts
├── fixtures/
│ ├── auth.ts
│ └── data.ts
└── playwright.config.ts
Page Object Model (POM)
import { Page, Locator } from '@playwright/test'
export class ItemsPage {
readonly page: Page
readonly searchInput: Locator
readonly itemCards: Locator
readonly createButton: Locator
constructor(page: Page) {
this.page = page
this.searchInput = page.locator('[data-testid="search-input"]')
this.itemCards = page.locator('[data-testid="item-card"]')
this.createButton = page.locator('[data-testid="create-btn"]')
}
async goto() {
await this.page.goto('/items')
await this.page.waitForLoadState('networkidle')
}
async search(query: string) {
await this.searchInput.fill(query)
await this.page.waitForResponse(resp => resp.url().includes('/api/search'))
await this.page.waitForLoadState('networkidle')
}
async getItemCount() {
return await this.itemCards.count()
}
}
Test Structure
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test'
import { ItemsPage } from '../../pages/ItemsPage'
test.describe('Item Search', () => {
let itemsPage: ItemsPage
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
itemsPage = new ItemsPage(page)
await itemsPage.goto()
})
test('should search by keyword', async ({ page }) => {
await itemsPage.search('test')
const count = await itemsPage.getItemCount()
expect(count).toBeGreaterThan(0)
await expect(itemsPage.itemCards.first()).toContainText(/test/i)
await page.screenshot({ path: 'artifacts/search-results.png' })
})
test('should handle no results', async ({ page }) => {
await itemsPage.search('xyznonexistent123')
await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="no-results"]')).toBeVisible()
expect(await itemsPage.getItemCount()).toBe(0)
})
})
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 328 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A b0e00e7e17cb
e2e-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository unrealandychan/clean-code-skill (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 2,122 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to e2e-testing, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
eval-dataset-design
A guide to creating reliable test sets for AI agents. Each evaluation task includes the request, the simulated user's behaviour, a reset starting state, and a success check that can be independently verified.
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
verify-omnigent
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
critique
Adversarial design critique of the current work — render it, look at it, and argue for rejection. Run after the gates are green, never instead of them.