flutter-dart-code-review

flutter-dart-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from unrealandychan/clean-code-skill. It costs 72 tokens per session (5,257 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of flutter-dart-code-review, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing Flutter and Dart code, covering widgets, state management, performance, accessibility, security, and project structure. It is designed to work with different Flutter state-management libraries.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing Flutter or Dart applications, including their widgets, business logic, dependencies, configuration, and platform-specific code.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers find tangled responsibilities, unsafe Dart patterns, stale generated files, loose analysis settings, and other maintenance problems.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when reviewing Flutter or Dart applications, including their widgets, business logic, dependencies, configuration, and platform-specific code.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/flutter-dart-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add unrealandychan/clean-code-skill --skill flutter-dart-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for flutter-dart-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/flutter-dart-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/flutter-dart-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/flutter-dart-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/flutter-dart-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for flutter-dart-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/flutter-dart-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unrealandychan/clean-code-skill/flutter-dart-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 72 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,257 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00072 $0.05257
Opus 5.5 $0.00029 $0.02103
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00014 $0.01051
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00526

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 5ceac13c9b99, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

flutter-dart-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to flutter-dart-code-review — 28 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/ecc/flutter-dart-code-review/SKILL.md · 437 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 437 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Flutter/Dart Code Review Best Practices

Comprehensive, library-agnostic checklist for reviewing Flutter/Dart applications. These principles apply regardless of which state management solution, routing library, or DI framework is used.


1. General Project Health

  • Project follows consistent folder structure (feature-first or layer-first)
  • Proper separation of concerns: UI, business logic, data layers
  • No business logic in widgets; widgets are purely presentational
  • pubspec.yaml is clean — no unused dependencies, versions pinned appropriately
  • analysis_options.yaml includes a strict lint set with strict analyzer settings enabled
  • No print() statements in production code — use dart:developer log() or a logging package
  • Generated files (.g.dart, .freezed.dart, .gr.dart) are up-to-date or in .gitignore
  • Platform-specific code isolated behind abstractions

2. Dart Language Pitfalls

  • Implicit dynamic: Missing type annotations leading to dynamic — enable strict-casts, strict-inference, strict-raw-types
  • Null safety misuse: Excessive ! (bang operator) instead of proper null checks or Dart 3 pattern matching (if (value case var v?))
  • Type promotion failures: Using this.field where local variable promotion would work
  • Catching too broadly: catch (e) without on clause; always specify exception types
  • Catching Error: Error subtypes indicate bugs and should not be caught
  • Unused async: Functions marked async that never await — unnecessary overhead
  • late overuse: late used where nullable or constructor initialization would be safer; defers errors to runtime
  • String concatenation in loops: Use StringBuffer instead of + for iterative string building
  • Mutable state in const contexts: Fields in const constructor classes should not be mutable
  • Ignoring Future return values: Use await or explicitly call unawaited() to signal intent
  • var where final works: Prefer final for locals and const for compile-time constants
  • Relative imports: Use package: imports for consistency
  • Mutable collections exposed: Public APIs should return unmodifiable views, not raw List/Map
  • Missing Dart 3 pattern matching: Prefer switch expressions and if-case over verbose is checks and manual casting
  • Throwaway classes for multiple returns: Use Dart 3 records (String, int) instead of single-use DTOs
  • print() in production code: Use dart:developer log() or the project's logging package; print() has no log levels and cannot be filtered

Read the full file on GitHub · 437 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 437 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 5ceac13c9b99

Subscribe to this mod's changes

flutter-dart-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository unrealandychan/clean-code-skill (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 5,257 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to flutter-dart-code-review, differing in 28 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

app-store-review

Evaluates code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS app code (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, or Expo) to identify potential App Store rejection issues before submission. Triggers on tasks involving app review preparation, compliance…

jacklandrin/OnlySwitch · 76 tokens

swiftui-pro

Comprehensively reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing SwiftUI projects.

twostraws/SwiftUI-Agent-Skill · 36 tokens

swift-concurrency-pro

Reviews Swift code for concurrency correctness, modern API usage, and common async/await pitfalls. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing Swift concurrency code.

jacklandrin/OnlySwitch · 35 tokens

axiom-audit-camera

Use this agent to scan Swift code for camera, video, and audio capture issues including deprecated APIs, missing interruption handlers, threading violations, and permission anti-patterns.

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 39 tokens

mobile-platform-offline-validate

Review a Lightning Web Component for mobile offline compatibility — the Komaci offline static analyzer that pre-primes the data graph for Salesforce Mobile App Plus and Field Service Mobile App. Produces a finding list with code-level fixes covering inline GraphQL queries in @wire configurations, modern lwc:if /…

forcedotcom/sf-skills · 207 tokens

mobiai-review-code

Use when reviewing mobile code changes — check for lifecycle issues, memory leaks, thread safety, and platform-specific pitfalls.

ArisGuimera/MobiAI-Core · 28 tokens