Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Unsupervisedcom/deepwork --skill prompt-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Unsupervisedcom/deepworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unsupervisedcom/deepwork/prompt-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unsupervisedcom/deepwork/prompt-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unsupervisedcom/deepwork/prompt-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unsupervisedcom/deepwork/prompt-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unsupervisedcom/deepwork/prompt-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01348 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00539 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
prompt-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 152 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A fccdbb4c30fe
prompt-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Unsupervisedcom/deepwork (50 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,348 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gemini-api-dev
Use this skill when writing code that calls the Gemini API for text generation, multi-turn chat, multimodal understanding, image generation, video generation, speech generation (TTS), voice design, voice replication, streaming responses, background research tasks, function calling, structured output, or migrating from…
natural
Render the provided prompt template with Jinja context and send it to the active NPC's LLM. The rendered text becomes the user prompt; the LLM response is placed in context['output'].
llm-integration
LLM integration patterns for function calling, streaming responses, local inference with Ollama, and fine-tuning customization. Use when implementing tool use, SSE streaming, local model deployment, LoRA/QLoRA fine-tuning, or multi-provider LLM APIs.
llm-app-development
LLM app development with RAG, prompt engineering, vector databases, and AI agents.
prompt-engineering
Provides workflows to write, debug, and optimize prompts for LLMs, including few-shot example selection, chain-of-thought structuring, system prompt design, and template composition. Use when the user asks to write or improve a prompt, wants help with few-shot examples, chain-of-thought, system prompts, prompt…
langchain4j-tool-function-calling-patterns
Provides and generates LangChain4j tool and function calling patterns: annotates methods as tools with @Tool, configures tool executors, registers tools with AiServices, validates tool parameters, and handles tool execution errors. Use when building AI agents that call tools, define function specifications, manage…