Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate --skill framework-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/framework-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/framework-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/framework-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/framework-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/framework-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Prompt Injection · line 38 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 43 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 44 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 45 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00266 | $0.09016 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00106 | $0.03606 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00053 | $0.01803 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00902 |
Grade A, and why
framework-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 291 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Framework Development — Evolve the QA Boilerplate
Gateway skill for changes to the framework itself: KATA layers, fixtures, installer, OpenAPI pipeline, scripts, doctrine docs. Per-ticket QA work, test specs, and TMS documentation are owned by other workflow skills (/sprint-testing, /test-documentation, /test-automation, /regression-testing) and MUST NOT trigger this skill.
The skill exists because framework-surface changes — new fixture, new layer helper, installer rewrite, manifest extractor — deserve a planning gate before code. Per-ticket test writing already has its own gate in /test-automation Plan → Code → Review; this skill is its architectural-surface counterpart.
Compact Rules
- DO NOT: use this skill for per-ticket work — test writing is
/test-automation, manual QA is/sprint-testing, TMS docs are/test-documentation, suite runs are/regression-testing. This skill governs the architectural surface only. - DO: clear the readiness preflight, then run the Phase 0 path self-check against
references/kata-invariants.md§10 before dispatching anything. A FORBIDDEN path aborts and redirects to the skill named in the row; a path in neither table is ASKED about, never assumed. - WHEN one change spans both ALLOWED and FORBIDDEN paths: split it. This skill changes the base;
/test-automationmigrates the consuming specs in a follow-up. - DO: run Plan → Code → Verify → Archive in order for every non-trivial framework change. The pipeline IS the gate; "it's a quick refactor" is not an exemption.
- DO NOT: edit per-ticket tests from a framework-development session: the specs under
tests/e2e/andtests/integration/and the per-module Page / Api / Steps components are/test-automationsurface. The KATA bases (TestContext.ts,ApiBase.ts,UiBase.ts) and the fixture files ARE yours (references/kata-invariants.md§10.1). - DO NOT: collapse the KATA layers (TestContext / Base / Domain / Fixture) under a simplicity argument. They are framework architecture, not speculative abstraction.
- DO NOT: add a new fixture API without updating the matching fixture file AND
kata-manifest.jsonAND citing at least one existing test that consumes it. Orphan fixtures rot, and the manifest is the anti-duplication gate. - DO NOT: bump a major version of Playwright / Bun / TypeScript without a regression run on a representative E2E suite — lockstep upgrades hide breaks in fixture lifecycle, locator engines, and type emit.
- DO NOT: refactor
cli/install.tswithout exercising the full install flow on a clean clone. Verification on an already-installed repo proves nothing, and the installer is the one surface where a bug ships silently to every new user. - WHEN the chosen approach reshapes test architecture (KATA layers, a fixture API, the runner, the isolation/parallelization model, the OpenAPI/type pipeline) AND is hard to reverse: record an ADR under
.context/ADR/after plan approval and before coding. The plan approval IS the decision, so the ADR is writtenAcceptedciting it, never handed back for acceptance (Proposedonly for a question still open). ADRs are append-only — supersede, never rewrite. - DO: verify with all four checks (test, types, lint, skills) and treat any non-zero exit as REJECT — present retry / skip-and-document / abort, never auto-fix. A skill that itself broke (a wrong step, a missing verifier, a stale rule) is reported upstream per
../agentic-qa-core/references/upstream-feedback.md: drafted and redacted locally, filed only on explicit OK, verified withgh issue view. - WHEN the change IS a skill (a new or restructured
.agents/skills/<slug>/): scaffold it per../agentic-qa-core/references/skill-scaffold.md(frontmatter incl.metadata.kind, per-kind files and sections, Definition of Done).skill-creator(T3, installed at project level) is ALWAYS the builder: load it for the draft, the test prompts, the evals and the description pass; the scaffold contract stays this repo's. Missing on the machine → scaffold from the reference's template and say so. Consumer SUT context skills are NOT this skill's job:project-contextmodecontext-skillowns them. - DO NOT: let a subagent write
progress.md; it is orchestrator-only. Code subagents return one-line summaries per task, and the orchestrator does not read their diffs. - DO: close every change that adds, renames or retires a skill, a
package.jsonscript or a doc path, OR changes a behaviour a page describes, with the docs follow-through (Phase 3): patch.agents/instructions/agent-context-map.mdand.agents/instructions/agent-skills-and-mcps.md,README.md,INSTALLER.md,CONTEXT.md, thedocs/core/pages, the decks (packages/decks/**) and the Pages home (packages/pages-home/**) in the same PR.bun run docs:checkproves the router and the quoted scripts; the prose is judgment. - WHEN an edit lands inside a
LINT.IfChange(<label>)region (the hook prints aDOCS:line; ADR-0016): update EVERY page itsLINT.ThenChange(...)names in the same push. Only when the documented behaviour did not change, addDocs-Checked: <label> <reason>to a commit message; NEVER add it by reflex or without a reason. Pre-push and CI block otherwise. A drift found later gets a new marker. - WHEN the change touches
cli/,scripts/,.husky/,AGENTS.mdor.agents/instructions/: run the V5 drift sweep after the four verifiers, report-only (Phase 3). It greps the doc surface for prose that describes the OLD behaviour and counts theDocs-Checked:trailers the change used. - DO: archive the session directory only after all four verifiers pass. On REJECT it stays in place so the run can be debugged or resumed.
- DO: route every change to
AGENTS.md, a section under.agents/instructions/, the ROUTER or atriggers:list through modeinstructions: place each sentence withreferences/instructions-doctrine.md§2, close withbun run instructions:check. NEVER paste section prose intoAGENTS.md, and NEVER add a ROUTER row without the ADR that decides it (--accept-router ADR-NNNN, ADR-0013). - WHEN a trigger misses or over-fires: fix the section's
triggers:and add the prompts tocli/lib/fixtures/instruction-router-eval.json; NEVER relabel a prompt to hide a miss.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago Changed · +38 lines · +58 tokens per session 5b5715e72fad
- 18d ago Changed · -2 lines · -9 tokens per session a221282f21e8
- 20d ago Changed f55d01d4ea8f
- 22d ago Changed · +5 lines · +21 tokens per session ea167a73d042
- 27d ago Changed · +2 lines 3728935ec645
- 28d ago Changed 87e264ffa7ea
- 29d ago Changed · +5 lines 17c2ccc4ae24
- 1mo ago Changed 8bf554cf4653
- 1mo ago Changed · +12 lines 500110ce9ee1
- 1mo ago First seen · 231 lines · 196 tokens per session scan A 1848fa24120e
framework-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate (26 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 266 tokens to every session and 9,016 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-testing-harness
Use this skill when testing AI agent systems. Activate when the user needs to test agent behavior, write tests for multi-agent systems, implement agent evaluation frameworks, create test harnesses for autonomous agents, or validate agent outputs systematically.
test-generation-patterns
Use this skill when generating tests with AI assistance. Activate when the user wants to create unit tests, integration tests, generate test cases, improve test coverage, write tests for existing code, or set up testing patterns for their project.
api-test-patterns
Write comprehensive API tests for REST and GraphQL endpoints. Use this skill when testing APIs, writing contract tests, or validating integrations. Activate when: api testing, REST test, GraphQL test, endpoint testing, integration test, postman, contract testing.
playwright-patterns
Write reliable, maintainable E2E tests with Playwright best practices. Use this skill when writing Playwright tests, debugging flaky tests, or setting up E2E automation. Activate when: playwright, e2e test, end-to-end, browser testing, UI automation, web testing.
test-case-design
Design comprehensive test cases with proper coverage and clear documentation. Use this skill when writing test cases, creating test suites, or improving test coverage. Activate when: test case, test scenario, test coverage, test design, write tests, BDD, gherkin.
regression-evals
Set up continuous regression evals so model/prompt/tool changes don't silently break existing behavior. Covers gating thresholds, CI integration, statistical significance, and response to regressions. Use this skill when deploying prompts to production, gating model upgrades, or noticing "it worked yesterday" in AI…