polling-analysis-writer

polling-analysis-writer is a skill for Claude Code from ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills. It costs 51 tokens per session (1,353 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A writing aid for explaining poll and survey results to a general audience. It covers the main finding, differences between groups, how the poll was run, and what the results cannot prove.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps turn poll figures into publishable copy, compare several polls, check an existing draft, and explain survey methods.
Why use it?
It helps prevent common mistakes such as overstating a small difference or treating a survey result as more certain than it is.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the autopunk-media-skills plugin — 187 skills shipped together

Good fit It helps turn poll figures into publishable copy, compare several polls, check an existing draft, and explain survey methods.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/polling-analysis-writer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills --skill polling-analysis-writer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install autopunk-media-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 187 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for polling-analysis-writer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/polling-analysis-writer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/polling-analysis-writer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/polling-analysis-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/polling-analysis-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for polling-analysis-writer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/polling-analysis-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/polling-analysis-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,353 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00051 $0.01353
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00677
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00271
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00135

Measured 12d ago against content hash f2740e373e86, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

polling-analysis-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/data-journalism/analysis/polling-analysis-writer/SKILL.md · 73 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Polling Analysis Writer

What This Skill Does

Analyses poll or survey results and writes a clear, accurate, publication-ready explanation for a general audience — covering the headline finding, key subgroup breakdowns, methodology caveats, and what the numbers do and do not mean.

When To Use This Skill

  • A polling firm or research organisation has released survey results and you need to write them up quickly and accurately
  • You want to check your draft poll write-up for errors in interpretation (particularly subgroup misuse)
  • You have multiple polls on the same question and need to contextualise the latest against previous findings
  • An editor needs a plain-language explainer of a complex survey methodology to accompany a polling story

What You Need To Provide

Required: The poll results — key headline figures, subgroup figures if relevant, sample size, fieldwork dates, and polling organisation. The question(s) asked, verbatim if possible. Optional: Previous poll figures on the same question; the commission source (who paid for the poll); the publication's audience register.

How the Assistant Approaches This

  1. Reviews the results for the five most common polling reporting errors: cherry-picking subgroups, ignoring margin of error, treating non-significant differences as meaningful, misrepresenting question wording, and omitting who commissioned the poll.
  2. Writes a plain-language summary that leads with the headline finding and places it in context — comparison to previous polls, margin of error, and any relevant methodology caveats.
  3. Flags any result in the data that appears to be a subgroup finding and warns if the subsample is too small to report reliably.

Output Format

A structured analysis document in three parts: (1) Headline summary — two to four sentences suitable for use as the opening of a news article. (2) Key findings — bullet list of three to six findings, each with the figure and a one-line plain-language gloss. (3) Methodology and caveats — two to five sentences on sample size, margin of error, fieldwork dates, question wording issues, and commissioning source. Readability target: accessible to any adult reader. No statistical jargon without immediate plain-language explanation.

Read the full file on GitHub · 73 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 73 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A f2740e373e86

Subscribe to this mod's changes

polling-analysis-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills (32 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,353 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.