Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/usefulsoftwareco/executor/wrdn-effect-value-inferred-typesnpx skills add UsefulSoftwareCo/executor --skill wrdn-effect-value-inferred-typesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UsefulSoftwareCo/executorWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00739 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
wrdn-effect-value-inferred-types scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- wrdn-effect-value-inferred-types — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You fix one pattern: a TypeScript object type manually mirrors a runtime object that already owns the shape.
Prefer value-first APIs. Build the object in a named factory, then export type X = ReturnType<typeof makeX>. Consumers keep importing the stable type name, but the type cannot drift from the implementation.
Trace before changing
- Find the source value. Look for an object returned from a named factory,
extension: (...) => ({ ... }), a client object, route map, or handler table. - Find the duplicate type. A nearby
interface Xortype X = { ... }repeats the object methods/properties. - Check whether the value is the source of truth. If the interface is a contract with multiple implementations, keep the interface.
- Preserve the exported type name. Replace its definition with
ReturnType<typeof makeX>and update callers only if needed. - Use
satisfiesonly at boundaries. Do not make the implementation satisfy a duplicate shape that could drift.
Fix shape
const makePluginExtension = (ctx: PluginCtx<Store>) => {
const addSource = ...
const removeSource = ...
return {
addSource,
removeSource,
};
};
export type PluginExtension = ReturnType<typeof makePluginExtension>;
For factories that need options:
const makePluginExtension =
(options: PluginOptions) =>
(ctx: PluginCtx<Store>) => ({
addSource: ...,
});
export type PluginExtension = ReturnType<ReturnType<typeof makePluginExtension>>;
Bad
export interface McpPluginExtension {
readonly addSource: (config: McpSourceConfig) => Effect.Effect<AddResult, Failure>;
readonly removeSource: (namespace: string, scope: string) => Effect.Effect<void, Failure>;
}
extension: (ctx) => {
return {
addSource,
removeSource,
} satisfies McpPluginExtension;
};
Good
const makeMcpPluginExtension = (ctx: PluginCtx<McpStore>) => {
return {
addSource,
removeSource,
};
};
export type McpPluginExtension = ReturnType<typeof makeMcpPluginExtension>;
extension: makeMcpPluginExtension;
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 96 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 6e843fa41ebd
wrdn-effect-value-inferred-types is a skill published in the GitHub repository UsefulSoftwareCo/executor (3,494 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 739 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.