Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vaaraio/vaara --skill vaara-governed-tool-callgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vaaraio/vaaraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaaraio/vaara/vaara-governed-tool-call)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaaraio/vaara/vaara-governed-tool-call"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaaraio/vaara/vaara-governed-tool-call/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaaraio/vaara/vaara-governed-tool-call"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaaraio/vaara/vaara-governed-tool-call.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.01241 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.00496 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
vaara-governed-tool-call scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 119 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 838af0626def
vaara-governed-tool-call is a skill published in the GitHub repository vaaraio/vaara (15 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 1,241 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hold-triage
Review and process pending governance holds. Use when holds are waiting for human approval or when the user asks about blocked operations.
eu-ai-act-compliance
Use when adding, changing or reviewing an AI feature that will be available in the EU, or when someone asks about the EU AI Act, risk tiers, Article 50 transparency, or what obligations apply. Classifies the use case and cites the Regulation rather than guessing.
ai-act-compliance
Use when the user asks about EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) compliance — classifying an AI system's risk tier (art. 5 prohibited / art. 6 + Annex III high-risk / art. 50 limited / minimal), evaluating conformity for high-risk AI (art. 8–17, 26–27), drafting Annex IV technical documentation, conducting a Fundamental…
eu-ai-act-compliance
Use when adding, changing or reviewing an AI feature that will be available in the EU, or when someone asks about the EU AI Act, risk tiers, Article 50 transparency, or what obligations apply. Classifies the use case and cites the Regulation rather than guessing.
policy
Define and enforce decision policies, compliance rules, and exceptions over Semantica graphs. Uses ContextGraph.checkdecisionrules/enforcedecisionpolicy and context.PolicyEngine.
receipt-query
Retrieve bounded receipt evidence by exact ids or explicit filters, returning native verification results for downstream review.