Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills --skill audit-logging-integritygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit-logging-integrity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit-logging-integrity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit-logging-integrity/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit-logging-integrity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit-logging-integrity.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.01691 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00052 | $0.00846 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00338 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
audit-logging-integrity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit Logging Integrity
Overview
This skill ensures audit logs are generated, protected, retained, and reviewable per:
- HIPAA §164.312(b): Audit controls—hardware, software, procedural mechanisms to record and examine activity in systems containing ePHI
- SOC 2 CC7.2/CC7.3: System monitoring, anomaly detection, security event analysis
- PCI-DSS Req 10: Log and monitor all access to network resources and cardholder data
AI agents and MCP servers must emit structured, tamper-evident audit events without logging raw ePHI/CHD in cleartext.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Designing agent session audit trails (prompt metadata, tool calls, redaction counts)
- Validating MCP server logging (tool invocations, auth events)
- Integrating logs with SIEM (Splunk, Elastic, Datadog, Sentinel)
- Testing log integrity (append-only, WORM, hash chains)
- Preparing PCI Req 10 or HIPAA audit control evidence
- Investigating gaps in security event review (daily log review, alerting)
Do not use this skill when:
- Identity access certification (use
access-control-identity-audit) - Breach customer notification letters (use
breach-incident-response) - Initial SOC 2 TSC mapping (use
soc2-trust-services-criteria)
Core Process
Execute steps in order.
Step 1: Audit event inventory
- List all systems requiring audit logs:
- Agent runtime, MCP servers, IdP, cloud control plane, CDE/ePHI databases
- Evidence store, deanonymization tool invocations
- Define required events per system:
| System | Required events |
|---|---|
| Agent | session_start, session_end, skill_loaded, tool_called, redaction_count |
| MCP | oauth_token_issued, tool_invoke, auth_failure, config_change |
| IdP | login_success, login_failure, mfa_challenge, account_lockout |
| DB | query (metadata only), connection, privilege_change |
- Artifact:
audit-event-catalog-{id}.json.
Step 2: Log content standards
- Each event must include minimum fields:
timestamp_utc,event_id,actor_id,action,resource,result,source_ip,correlation_id
- Prohibited in logs (or require field-level encryption):
- Raw ePHI, PAN, CVV, secrets, full prompts with PHI
- Acceptable alternatives:
- Redacted prompt hash, token counts, resource IDs without patient identifiers
- Verify agent logs
entity_countfrom redaction, not original values.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 142 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 5fadf7fa60a9
audit-logging-integrity is a skill published in the GitHub repository vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 1,691 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
cmmc-assessment-objectives
Verbatim reference for all 320 NIST 800-171A Rev 2 assessment objectives, plus the Rev 2 → Rev 3 control crosswalk. Use for AO-level lookups (e.g., 3.1.1[c]), evidence planning, and forward-mapping to Rev 3. Pairs with cmmc-expert.
dora-expert
DORA expert for EU financial entities. Deep knowledge of Digital Operational Resilience Act including 5 pillars, ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party oversight, and information sharing for financial sector digital resilience.
cmmc-expert
CMMC v2.0 expert for DoD contractors. Covers NIST 800-171 Rev 2 (14 families, 110 controls), SPRS scoring, POA&M rules, 32 CFR Part 170, DFARS clauses, scoping, ESP/CSP, C3PAO assessment lifecycle, and Rev 2 → Rev 3 transition.
eu-nis2-expert
EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) expert. Reference-depth knowledge of essential vs important entity classification, Article 20 governance, the Article 21 ten cybersecurity risk-management measures, the Article 23 24h/72h/1mo incident-reporting timeline, and supervision/enforcement under Articles 32-34.…
gdpr-expert
GDPR expert for EU privacy compliance. Deep knowledge of General Data Protection Regulation including 99 articles, 7 principles, 6 lawful bases, data subject rights, DPO requirements, DPIA, breach notification, cross-border transfers, and enforcement.
glba-expert
GLBA expert for financial institutions. Deep knowledge of Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act including Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314), Privacy Rule (16 CFR Part 313), FTC enforcement, information security program requirements, vendor management, and consumer privacy notices.