Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills --skill soc2-evidence-collectiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/soc2-evidence-collection)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/soc2-evidence-collection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/soc2-evidence-collection/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/soc2-evidence-collection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/soc2-evidence-collection.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.01743 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00872 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00174 |
Grade A, and why
soc2-evidence-collection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SOC 2 Evidence Collection
Overview
This skill implements automated and semi-automated evidence collection for SOC 2 Type I/II examinations. Evidence must be complete, dated, tamper-evident, and mapped to TSC control IDs. The agent uses MCP tools where available:
- Playwright MCP: screenshots, DOM/state captures for web admin consoles
- Postgres MCP: query exports for access lists, change tickets, control status
- Slack MCP: export approval messages (redacted) for change management evidence
- Shell/API exports: IAM policies, Terraform state metadata, cloud config snapshots
Every artifact receives a SHA-256 hash and entry in an evidence manifest suitable for auditor import.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Building an audit evidence binder for SOC 2 Type I or Type II
- Responding to auditor evidence requests (ERDs, sample periods)
- Populating GRC platform evidence slots (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe alternatives)
- Packaging quarterly control testing results
- Collecting point-in-time and period-of-time samples (Type II requires continuous samples)
- Documenting agent/MCP compliance after running other skills (PCI, HIPAA)
Do not use this skill when:
- Defining which TSC controls apply (use
soc2-trust-services-criteria) - Real-time drift detection (use
soc2-ccm-continuous-monitoring) - Replacing auditor judgment on sample adequacy
Core Process
Execute steps in order.
Step 1: Evidence request intake
- Obtain auditor evidence request list or map from TSC control matrix.
- For each request, record:
- Control ID (e.g., CC6.1, CC7.2)
- Evidence type (screenshot, config export, log sample, policy PDF)
- Sample period (for Type II: e.g., Q1–Q4 2025)
- Population and sample size (auditor may specify)
- Artifact:
evidence-request-register-{id}.csv.
Step 2: Collection plan and tool mapping
| Evidence type | Primary collection method | MCP/tool |
|---|---|---|
| IAM user list + MFA status | Cloud API or IdP export | Shell, Postgres |
| Admin console screenshot | Authenticated browser capture | Playwright MCP |
| Firewall/security group rules | Cloud API JSON export | Shell |
| Change tickets | ITSM export | Postgres, API |
| Log sample (auth failures) | SIEM query export | Postgres, API |
| Policy documents | Document store hash | File read |
| Agent skill validation | Git commit + CI run | Shell |
| MCP access logs | Log aggregator export | Postgres |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 159 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A e615f8b52d73
soc2-evidence-collection is a skill published in the GitHub repository vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 1,743 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
cmmc-assessment-objectives
Verbatim reference for all 320 NIST 800-171A Rev 2 assessment objectives, plus the Rev 2 → Rev 3 control crosswalk. Use for AO-level lookups (e.g., 3.1.1[c]), evidence planning, and forward-mapping to Rev 3. Pairs with cmmc-expert.
dora-expert
DORA expert for EU financial entities. Deep knowledge of Digital Operational Resilience Act including 5 pillars, ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party oversight, and information sharing for financial sector digital resilience.
cmmc-expert
CMMC v2.0 expert for DoD contractors. Covers NIST 800-171 Rev 2 (14 families, 110 controls), SPRS scoring, POA&M rules, 32 CFR Part 170, DFARS clauses, scoping, ESP/CSP, C3PAO assessment lifecycle, and Rev 2 → Rev 3 transition.
eu-nis2-expert
EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) expert. Reference-depth knowledge of essential vs important entity classification, Article 20 governance, the Article 21 ten cybersecurity risk-management measures, the Article 23 24h/72h/1mo incident-reporting timeline, and supervision/enforcement under Articles 32-34.…
gdpr-expert
GDPR expert for EU privacy compliance. Deep knowledge of General Data Protection Regulation including 99 articles, 7 principles, 6 lawful bases, data subject rights, DPO requirements, DPIA, breach notification, cross-border transfers, and enforcement.
glba-expert
GLBA expert for financial institutions. Deep knowledge of Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act including Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314), Privacy Rule (16 CFR Part 313), FTC enforcement, information security program requirements, vendor management, and consumer privacy notices.