Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vaquarkhan/data-engineering-agent-skills --skill notebook-to-production-hardeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vaquarkhan/data-engineering-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/data-engineering-agent-skills/notebook-to-production-hardening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/data-engineering-agent-skills/notebook-to-production-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaquarkhan/data-engineering-agent-skills/notebook-to-production-hardening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/data-engineering-agent-skills/notebook-to-production-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaquarkhan/data-engineering-agent-skills/notebook-to-production-hardening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00442 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00221 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
notebook-to-production-hardening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Notebook To Production Hardening
Overview
Use this skill when a notebook has outgrown exploration and needs to become a maintainable delivery artifact. It helps agents separate experimentation from production packaging, testing, configuration, and orchestration.
When to Use
- moving notebook logic into scheduled jobs
- hardening
DatabricksorJupyternotebooks for repeated use - extracting reusable logic from cells into modules or packages
- improving testability and deployment discipline
Do not treat a manually rerun notebook as production just because it worked once.
Workflow
-
Separate exploratory work from production logic. Identify:
- reusable transformation code
- parameters
- environment assumptions
- manual steps
-
Extract logic into versioned, testable units.
-
Replace hidden state with explicit inputs and configuration.
-
Add validation and operational hooks. Include:
- contracts
- logging
- error handling
- retry-safe outputs
-
Define how the job is deployed and monitored.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "The notebook already works." | Interactive success does not mean repeatable, testable, or observable production behavior. |
| "We can keep using widgets and manual edits." | Hidden runtime state makes failures and reproducibility much worse. |
| "We will modularize later." | Notebook sprawl grows quickly once other teams depend on it. |
Red Flags
- business logic depends on cell order
- configuration is hard-coded in notebook cells
- outputs are written with no validation or idempotency plan
- the deployment path is undefined
Verification
- Reusable logic is extracted from the notebook flow
- Inputs, configuration, and outputs are explicit
- Validation, logging, and retry-safe behavior exist
- The production deployment and monitoring model are defined
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 64 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A be48735a5533
notebook-to-production-hardening is a skill published in the GitHub repository vaquarkhan/data-engineering-agent-skills (45 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 442 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
kafka-shadowtraffic-java
Generate a TestContainers Java test class that spins up ShadowTraffic in-process to populate a Kafka topic with synthetic data during tests. Invokes the kafka-shadowtraffic skill to build the ShadowTraffic config, then adapts it for a containerized test network and scaffolds a JUnit 5 test class with Kafka, optional…
workflow-patterns
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
skillshare-implement-feature
Implement a feature from a spec file or description using TDD workflow. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: add a new CLI command, implement a feature from a spec, build new functionality, add a flag, create a new internal package, or write Go code for skillshare. This skill enforces test-first development…
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
Changelog Test Mapper
Map changelog entries and release notes to affected test cases, ensuring every user-facing change has corresponding test coverage verification.
Error Boundary Tester
Validate error boundary implementations in React and other frameworks ensuring graceful degradation, proper fallback UI rendering, and error recovery flows.