Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vaquarkhan/Fullstack-development-agent-skills --skill terraform-fullstack-infrastructure-as-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vaquarkhan/Fullstack-development-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/fullstack-development-agent-skills/terraform-fullstack-infrastructure-as-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/fullstack-development-agent-skills/terraform-fullstack-infrastructure-as-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaquarkhan/fullstack-development-agent-skills/terraform-fullstack-infrastructure-as-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vaquarkhan/fullstack-development-agent-skills/terraform-fullstack-infrastructure-as-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vaquarkhan/fullstack-development-agent-skills/terraform-fullstack-infrastructure-as-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00318 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00127 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
terraform-fullstack-infrastructure-as-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Terraform Fullstack Infrastructure As Code
Use When
- Infrastructure managed across AWS, Azure, or GCP
- Teams need repeatable environment provisioning
Workflow
- Model environments with clear variable contracts
- Use modules for network, compute, data, and observability
- Enforce plan/apply gates in CI/CD
- Define state backend locking and access controls
- Document destroy and rollback implications
Required Checks
- Terraform plans reviewed before apply
- Secrets not stored in state plaintext
- Drift detection scheduled or enforced
- Blast radius limited per module boundary
Decision Framework
- Keep modules small and composable
- Pin provider versions for reproducibility
- Separate state per environment or domain
- Run policy checks (OPA/Sentinel/Checkov) in pipeline
Common Rationalizations And Rebuttals
- "ClickOps is faster." -> Drift and audit gaps accumulate.
- "One giant module is easier." -> Changes become risky and slow.
- "Apply without plan review." -> Production incidents become likely.
Evidence Pack
- Plan output attached to change request
- Policy check pass evidence
- Rollback or destroy-safe notes for data resources
- Post-apply smoke test results
Exit Criteria
- Infrastructure changes are auditable and reversible
- Environments stay consistent across teams
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A b9568b3b03b4
terraform-fullstack-infrastructure-as-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository vaquarkhan/Fullstack-development-agent-skills (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 318 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
docs-deployment
How apps/docs is hosted and shipped — SSG on AWS S3 + CloudFront, OpenTofu/Terraform infrastructure, and the nx-affected CI deploy workflow. Read before any question or change about docs hosting, the SSG hosting model, CloudFront, S3, CDN caching, the qalma.dev domain, the ACM/TLS cert, the OIDC deploy role, or the…
atmos-sbom
Atmos SBOM provenance: CycloneDX and SPDX generation from vendor and Terraform evidence, coverage diagnostics, NTIA validation, and native CI workflow-artifact publication.
devops-cloud
DevOps, cloud infrastructure, and platform engineering. Use when working with AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Terraform, CI/CD pipelines, or infrastructure as code.
architecture-paradigm-microservices
Applies microservices for independent deployment and per-service scaling. Use when teams need autonomous release cycles with distinct capability scaling needs.
hunt-cicd
Hunt CI/CD pipeline vulnerabilities — GitHub Actions workflow injection (pullrequesttarget Pwnrequest + ${{ }}-into-shell), self-hosted runner poisoning, OIDC trust-policy abuse, Jenkins script-console RCE and CVE-2024-23897 file read, GitLab CI runner-token registration, Terraform state file leakage, artifact/log…
ops-cost-optimization
Audits SaaS, cloud, payment, and AI spend. Use when analyzing bills, right-sizing plans, sizing Savings Plans or CUDs, cutting payment-processing fees, or LLM self-host breakeven.