Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to varandrew/moor. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/varandrew/moor/main/.agents/skills/gitnexus-impact-analysis/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/varandrew/moorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/varandrew/moor/gitnexus-impact-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/varandrew/moor/gitnexus-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/varandrew/moor/gitnexus-impact-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/varandrew/moor/gitnexus-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/varandrew/moor/gitnexus-impact-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01776 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00710 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00355 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
gitnexus-impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- gitnexus-impact-analysis — 100% identical, 14 lines differ
- gitnexus-impact-analysis — 91% identical, 23 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Impact Analysis with GitNexus
When to Use
- "Is it safe to change this function?"
- "What will break if I modify X?"
- "Show me the blast radius"
- "Who uses this code?"
- Before making non-trivial code changes
- Before committing — to understand what your changes affect
Bind the repository first
Impact analysis is the gate that authorizes an edit, so it must answer for the repository you are about to edit.
Call list_repos {} before the first tool call. With one indexed repository,
use the examples below as written. With more than one, pass repo on every
call: an omitted repo normally errors, but under an MCP policy with a
configured default it resolves to that default silently. If you cannot tell
which repository is meant, stop and ask — every result below an ambiguous
identity inherits the ambiguity. list_repos is paginated, so page with
offset: pagination.nextOffset until hasMore is false before concluding a
repository is absent.
detect_changes takes worktree when your changes are in a linked worktree
the MCP server was not launched from. The server auto-detects a worktree only
when it was launched from inside one; otherwise git diff runs in the wrong
checkout and reports zero changed symbols — a false clean check that carries
none of the degradation flags described below. In the CLI fallbacks, --repo .
means the current checkout; pass the intended repository path instead when you
are not standing in it.
State the bound identity with your risk report:
Repository: <name> (<path>) Worktree: <path> Index: <commit>, <n> behind HEAD
Workflow
0. list_repos {} → Bind repo (and worktree)
1. impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact "X" --direction upstream --repo .`
2. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes → Check affected execution flows
3. detect_changes({scope: "all"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs detect-changes --scope all --repo .`
4. Assess risk and report to user, echoing repo/worktree/index identity
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago First seen · 168 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A d1f2e31528c7
gitnexus-impact-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository varandrew/moor (163 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,776 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-09.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…