Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add velinussage/brand-gen --skill brand-gen-experiment-modelinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/velinussage/brand-genWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/velinussage/brand-gen/brand-gen-experiment-modeling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/velinussage/brand-gen/brand-gen-experiment-modeling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/velinussage/brand-gen/brand-gen-experiment-modeling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/velinussage/brand-gen/brand-gen-experiment-modeling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/velinussage/brand-gen/brand-gen-experiment-modeling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00206 | $0.02177 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00082 | $0.00871 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00435 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
brand-gen-experiment-modeling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
For Sage brand work in Pi, use the paste-ready prompt at docs/prompts/pi-sage-brand-gen-full-pipeline.md. Keep this link instead of copying the full prompt into skill bodies.
Brand-Gen Experiment Modeling
Risk addressed: brand-gen computes 2-3 ranked aesthetic variants in build_aesthetic_direction_brief (brand_gen/aesthetic_curation.py:231) — and discards them. Only the _resolved_capsule (one variant) flows into the prompt. branch_id and parent_branch_id exist in pipeline_types.py:261 but are populated to workflow_id everywhere; nothing forks. Three parallel selection systems (aesthetic_archetypes rotation, aesthetic_curation capsule scoring, surface_strategy strategy scoring, plus a design_variance 1-10 dial) merge in plan_builder.py:506-528 with no shared "Variant" type.
This skill answers: does the system support trying N aesthetic directions and converging on one, today? If not, what's the smallest abstraction that would?
What this skill produces
{
"summary": {
"first_class_variant_type_exists": false,
"variants_materialized_per_run": 3,
"variants_used_per_run": 1,
"branch_id_populated_distinct_from_workflow": false,
"parallel_selection_systems": 4,
"shared_selection_signature": null
},
"variant_lifecycle": [
{ "stage": "create", "site": "aesthetic_curation.py:231 build_aesthetic_direction_brief", "shape": "{primary, alternates[2], difference_axes[], selection_rule}" },
{ "stage": "plan_attach", "site": "plan_builder.py:523", "shape": "embedded as plan['aesthetic_direction_brief'] dict" },
{ "stage": "prompt_consume", "site": "prompt_assembly.py:??", "shape": "prose render of primary only — alternates not referenced" },
{ "stage": "scratchpad_persist", "site": "generation_flow.py:assemble_generation_scratchpad", "shape": "?" },
{ "stage": "score_address", "site": "scoring/program.py BrandScorer", "shape": "no variant addressing — single brand_dna string" },
{ "stage": "iteration_memory_address", "site": "iteration_memory.py", "shape": "no variant addressing — flat per-version entries" }
],
"selection_systems": [
{ "name": "aesthetic_archetype", "module": "aesthetic_archetypes.py", "score_fn": "pick_rotating_archetype", "output_type": "dict", "merges_at": "plan_builder.py:506-528" },
{ "name": "aesthetic_capsule", "module": "aesthetic_curation.py", "score_fn": "_capsule_score", "output_type": "dict", "merges_at": "plan_builder.py:506-528" },
{ "name": "surface_strategy", "module": "surface_strategy.py", "score_fn": "_score_strategy", "output_type": "dict", "merges_at": "plan_builder.py:506-528" },
{ "name": "design_variance_dial", "module": "card_engine.py", "score_fn": "n/a (int 1-10 from caller)", "output_type": "int", "merges_at": "card_engine.py taste_design_directives" }
],
"branch_field_usage": [
{ "site": "pipeline_types.py:261 declaration", "populated_to": "n/a" },
{ "site": "pipeline_runner.py", "populated_to": "workflow_id (no actual branching)" }
],
"recommendation": {
"abstraction": "AestheticExperiment",
"fields": ["experiment_id", "parent_experiment_id", "variants: List[Variant]", "selected_variant_id", "selection_rationale", "scoring_dimension", "decision_state"],
"variant_fields": ["variant_id", "archetype", "capsule", "surface_strategy", "design_variance", "selection_score", "selection_reasons", "differentiating_axes"],
"seam": "between MaterialPlan (plan-build phase output) and GenerationScratchpad (execute phase input)",
"minimum_changes": ["promote variants[] from plan dict to typed list", "carry through generation_flow scratchpad payload", "extend BrandScorer.forward to accept variant context", "extend iteration_memory entries to reference variant_id"]
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 206 tokens per session scan A 6ba4a93d7f25
brand-gen-experiment-modeling is a skill published in the GitHub repository velinussage/brand-gen (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 206 tokens to every session and 2,177 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
brand-gen-experiment-modeling compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brand-gen-experiment-modelingvelinussage/brand-gen | Skill | 0 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 206 | Claude Code, Codex |
| html-ppt-zhangzara-block-framenexu-io/open-design | Skill | 107k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 51 | Claude Code, Codex |
| accesslint-scansickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | Skill | 49k | yesterday | MIT | A | 32 | Claude Code |
| checktw93/Waza | Skill | 7.5k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code |
| healthtw93/Waza | Skill | 7.5k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code |
| hunttw93/Waza | Skill | 7.5k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| thinktw93/Waza | Skill | 7.5k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code |